Sexual Assault Survivors Often Charged Thousands in Hospital Bills, Study Finds

|

Despite federal laws prohibiting the charging of medical bills caused by a sexual assault, a new study has found more than 15% of survivors are still being asked to pay out-of-pocket expenses, averaging thousands of dollars.

Findings published this month in the New England Journal of Medicine highlight several gaps in the existing restrictions on medical billing for sexual assault survivors.

Researchers from Planned Parenthood and City University of New York at Hunter College report that despite the Violence Against Women Act, which is a federal law that was enacted in 1994 that prohibits sexual assault survivors from being charged for forensic exams, several services still are submitted to health insurance carriers or billed or directly to the victim.

The study involved a review of data on approximately 113,000 emergency department visits for survivors of sexual violence reported to the Department of Health and Human Services for 2019, finding 16% of victims, whether covered under health insurance or without, suffered financial losses.

The report indicates 16% of survivors suffered financial loss, with the average cost of medical billing to the patient amounting to $3,551 per person. For sexual assault survivors that were pregnant at the time, the average out-of-pocket costs increased drastically, with an average of $4,553 per person. The average cost of care for uninsured patients was $3,673.

The report found in several instances where survivors were charged for the exams and services provided by specialists, emergency contraception or treatment for sexually transmitted infections. Additional services found to be excluded from the federal law’s billing rules were services needed following the immediate evaluation, which included diagnostic testing, counseling, pregnancy tests or other services not considered part of that exam.

Researchers warn that these costs disproportionately affect low-income women and called for the Violence Against Women Act to be expanded to cover all services connected to sexual assault.

Written by: Russell Maas

Managing Editor & Senior Legal Journalist

Russell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nation’s leading personal injury law firms and oversees the site’s editorial strategy, including SEO and content development.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

An increasing number of Ozempic and Mounjaro users are reporting sudden, irreversible vision loss from NAION side effects, prompting new lawsuits and a federal push to consolidate blindness claims into a dedicated multidistrict litigation.
Cartiva is urging federal judges to reject consolidation of toe-implant lawsuits, arguing that an MDL would interfere with individual claim resolutions that the company says are already being handled efficiently outside of court.
The first Covidien Symbotex mesh bellwether has been restored to the 2026 trial calendar, signaling renewed momentum in a litigation where more than 2,000 similar claims are still awaiting resolution.