Skip Navigation

Eligible for a Sports Betting Addiction lawsuit?

DraftKings Settlement Reached in Lawsuit Over MLB Gambling Promotions

DraftKings Settlement Reached in Lawsuit Over MLB Gambling Promotions

The union representing Major League Baseball players has reached a settlement to resolve a lawsuit alleging that DraftKings and Bet365 illegally used their likenesses during sports betting promotions without first gaining permission.

Originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania back in September 2024, the MLB Players Inc. complaint (PDF) indicated that the two sports betting apps used the image, name or likeness of nearly every currently active MLB player. However, the lawsuit claims the sportsbooks never got the players’, or the league’s, permission to do so.

Since the lawsuit was filed, there has been a growing concern nationwide over the popularity of sports betting as more states approve the practice since the Supreme Court made it legal to do so in a landmark 2018 decision.

Sports Gambling Addiction Lawsuits

Dozens of states have legalized sports betting in recent years. However, with the expansion has come reports of increased gambling addiction problems nationwide, particularly among young people who are comfortable with digital payments through mobile apps on their smart devices. This group of young gamblers, who are also often managing their own finances for the first time, appear to be particularly susceptible to sports betting promotions.

Critics claim that by employing aggressive and sometimes deceptive promotions, data-tracking algorithms and logging players’ behavior, sites like DraftKings, Bet365 and FanDuel encourage those who show signs of gambling addiction to make more frequent and larger bets.

This has led to the filing of numerous sports betting addiction lawsuits nationwide in recent months, each involving similar allegations that the betting platforms intentionally encourage compulsive gambling and self-destructive wagering to increase their profit margins.

Sportsbooks-Lawsuits
Sportsbooks-Lawsuits

In addition to individual claims, DraftKings, Bet365 and FanDuel have faced additional litigation from states, cities and sports organizations for allegedly violating numerous state gambling and consumer protection laws.

MLB Players Gambling Settlement

According to the 2024 lawsuit, DraftKings and Bet365 never sought permission to use players’ images in promotions, noting that the companies could have just used the athletes’ names without violating trademark and copyright laws. The use of players’ likenesses was purely for the purpose of gaining consumers’ attention, leading to more betting and increasing profits, the players’ union noted.

“Defendants’ use of player images within their sportsbook platforms is not merely informational—it is promotional. Users could bet that the Phillies will beat the Marlins, or that Bryce Harper will hit more than two home runs in a given game, without seeing Harper’s valuable image.”

MLB Players Inc. v. DraftKings Inc. et al

However, after about a year and a half of litigation, U.S. District Judge Karen Marston, of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, issued a court order (PDF) on April 6, dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice, indicating that the parties have informed the court they have reached a settlement agreement.

Details of the settlement have not yet been released. The lawsuit originally included FanDuel as a defendant as well, but the sportsbook reportedly reached a settlement with the union in late 2024.

Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuits

While the sports betting apps have reached settlements with the MLB players union, they are still fighting an increasing number of gambling addiction lawsuits filed by individual consumers nationwide.

Observers expect thousands of similar claims to be filed in the coming months and years, indicating that individuals have been exploited by predatory algorithms and promotions used by DraftKings, FanDuel and Bet365.

Sports betting addiction lawyers are investigating claims across the U.S., focusing on whether these platforms intentionally foster compulsive behavior and profit from users’ escalating losses. Platforms named in ongoing investigations include:

  • FanDuel
  • DraftKings
  • BetMGM
  • Caesars
  • ESPN Bet
  • Bet365
  • Fanatics Sportsbook
  • PointsBet
  • Barstool Sportsbook
  • Hard Rock Bet

To find out whether you qualify for a sports betting lawsuit, submit information about your potential claim for an attorney to review. All cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless a settlement is obtained in your case.

To stay up to date on this litigation, sign up to receive sports betting addiction lawsuit updates sent directly to your inbox.

Image Credit: Shutterstock.com / HE Photography
Irvin Jackson
Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Louisiana man’s Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha SCS lawsuit claims the implant failed to provide the promised pain relief and, in fact, made things worse before it needed to be surgically removed.
A Tennessee man’s lawsuit alleges that BetMGM ignored his placement on self-exclusion lists maintained by both the State of Tennessee and the company’s own platform.