Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
St. Joseph Stent Settlement Reached for $22M Over Unnecessary Procedures November 10, 2010 Staff Writers Add Your Comments St. Joseph Medical Center in Maryland has agreed to pay $22 million to settle federal allegations that it paid kickbacks to a group of doctors over procedures where patients were allegedly implanted with unnecessary heart stents. The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the St. Joseph Medical Center stent settlement on Tuesday, saying that the agreement addresses violations of the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Act and the Stark Law. According to the DOJ, professional services agreements the Towson, Maryland hospital had with MidAtlantic Cardiovascular Associates (MACVA) constituted kickbacks. In return, MACVA referred patients to undergo expensive cardiovascular procedures at the hospital. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Over the past year, St. Joseph Medical Center has sent more than 600 letters to former patients of Dr. Mark Midei, alerting them that a subsequent review of their medical procedure indicates that they may have been implanted with a coronary heart stent they did not need. In many of the cases, Dr. Midei told patients that they had severe coronary blockages, when in reality they only had minor blockages that did not require a stent placement. Stent procedures, which are designed to prop open arteries that are significantly blocked, can cost $10,000 or more. Typically it is necessary for there to be at least a 70% artery blockage for a stent implant to be necessary, and many patients who have received these letters were originally told that they had blockages over that amount. However, after a subsequent review of records from the procedure, many of the patients were found to have blockages that were well under 50%, which is generally considered “insignificant.” Some patients who received stents had blockages as low as 10%. DOJ investigators say that while Midei was implanting patients with heart stents they did not need, St. Joseph Medical Center had 11 professional service agreements with MACVA where the hospital paid above fair market value for services that either MACVA never performed or services that were performed for prices that were not commercially reasonable. The DOJ maintains that the agreements were meant to entice MACVA to refer patients to the medical center. The stent surgery problems at St. Joseph Medical Center were uncovered as part of the federal government’s investigation of Medicare fraud and other health law violations involving the financial relationship between the hospital and the affiliated group of cardiologists. While St. Joseph hospital initially denied that any patient care was impacted, they are no longer making such statements, and have since reviewed all procedures performed by Dr. Midei between May 2007 and 2009. Dr. Midei, who led the hospital’s cardiac catheterization unit, has denied any wrongdoing. The hospital stripped him of his position at the hospital during the summer of 2009 without explanation, and at least three other executives have left their jobs amid the investigation. The whistleblower lawsuit was brought in June by Dr. Stephen D. Lincoln, Dr. Peter Horneffer and Dr. Garth McDonald. All were cardiac surgeons who were part of Cardiac Surgery Associates in Baltimore. Under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act, whistleblowers who report a false claim against the government may be entitled to receive a portion of any money that the government recovers from the offenders. In return, the whistleblower must be the first to bring the case to the government’s attention, and must not publicize the claim until the DOJ decides to prosecute the claim. In addition to the $22 million settlement payment, St. Joseph Medical Center also entered into a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Office of Inspector General, promising to ensure accurate billing and legal relationships with businesses that refer patients to the hospital. It will also have an independent review conducted of its cardiac catheterization program and will have outside consultants look at its peer review program. A number of individuals who received an unneeded stent have filed their own lawsuit against St. Joseph Medical Center, seeking compensation from the hospital for damages associated with the unnecessary medical procedures. Tags: Baltimore, Dr. Mark Midei, Heart Surgery, Maryland, Qui Tam, St. Joseph Medical Center, Stent, Towson, Whistleblower Image Credit: | More Lawsuit Stories Lawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial January 28, 2026 Syngenta Settles Paraquat Parkinson’s Lawsuit as Trial Was Set To Begin in Philadelphia January 28, 2026 Otis Elevator Lawsuit Alleges Malfunction Caused Elevator To Descend Uncontrolled January 28, 2026 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (Posted: today) Ahead of a case management conference this week, hair relaxer cancer lawsuit lawyers have asked a federal judge to set a date for the first bellwether trial. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITPresentations on How Hair Relaxers Cause Cancer Will Be Heard by MDL Judge This Week (01/05/2026)Hair Relaxer Manufacturers Push for Evidence Many Plaintiffs Did Not Likely Keep (12/10/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit MDL Status Hearings Scheduled Throughout 2026 (11/13/2025) Bard PowerPort Settlement Talks May Heat Up as First Bellwether Trials Approach in 2026 (Posted: yesterday) As Bard PowerPort litigation nears its first bellwether trials, the prospect of major jury verdicts over catheter fracture, migration and infection injuries is increasing speculation that settlement talks may intensify, following earlier claims that Becton Dickinson says were resolved in about 18 months before consolidation into a federal MDL. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin April 21, 2026 (01/15/2026)Cook Flexor Sheath Lawsuit Claims Defective Catheter Device Led to Woman’s Death (01/06/2026)More Than 2,500 Bard Powerport Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (12/05/2025) Abbott Eterna Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Lead Migration, Device Malfunction (Posted: 2 days ago) A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims an Abbott Eterna device failed after only two months due to lead migration. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Lead and Battery Problems Led to Multiple Revision Surgeries (10/22/2025)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Device Worsened Pain (04/30/2025)FDA Tells Doctors To Conduct Trial Stimulation Test Before Using Spinal Cord Stimulators (09/04/2020)
Syngenta Settles Paraquat Parkinson’s Lawsuit as Trial Was Set To Begin in Philadelphia January 28, 2026
Lawyers Call for Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit To Be Set for Trial (Posted: today) Ahead of a case management conference this week, hair relaxer cancer lawsuit lawyers have asked a federal judge to set a date for the first bellwether trial. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITPresentations on How Hair Relaxers Cause Cancer Will Be Heard by MDL Judge This Week (01/05/2026)Hair Relaxer Manufacturers Push for Evidence Many Plaintiffs Did Not Likely Keep (12/10/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuit MDL Status Hearings Scheduled Throughout 2026 (11/13/2025)
Bard PowerPort Settlement Talks May Heat Up as First Bellwether Trials Approach in 2026 (Posted: yesterday) As Bard PowerPort litigation nears its first bellwether trials, the prospect of major jury verdicts over catheter fracture, migration and infection injuries is increasing speculation that settlement talks may intensify, following earlier claims that Becton Dickinson says were resolved in about 18 months before consolidation into a federal MDL. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin April 21, 2026 (01/15/2026)Cook Flexor Sheath Lawsuit Claims Defective Catheter Device Led to Woman’s Death (01/06/2026)More Than 2,500 Bard Powerport Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (12/05/2025)
Abbott Eterna Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Lead Migration, Device Malfunction (Posted: 2 days ago) A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims an Abbott Eterna device failed after only two months due to lead migration. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Lead and Battery Problems Led to Multiple Revision Surgeries (10/22/2025)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Device Worsened Pain (04/30/2025)FDA Tells Doctors To Conduct Trial Stimulation Test Before Using Spinal Cord Stimulators (09/04/2020)