Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit Side effects of the Gardasil HPV vaccine have been linked to reports of serious and debilitating autoimmune injuries. Lawyers review cases nationwide.
St. Jude Riata Lawsuit Scheduled for Trial in Feb. 2015 March 20, 2014 Austin Kirk Add Your Comments A bellwether trial has been scheduled for February 2015, involving two product liability lawsuits filed by individuals who claim they experienced problems with St. Jude Riata defibrillator leads, which were recalled amid reports that the wires were defective. U.S. District Judge James V. Selna is currently presiding over about a half dozen St. Jude Riata lawsuits filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. All of the cases involve similar allegations that the small wires used to connect implantable defibrillators to the heart were defective and prone to failure, which may cause the device to produce unnecessary shocks or fail to work when needed to deliver life-saving jolts. Learn More About St. Jude Riata Lead Lawsuit A St. Jude Riata defibrillator lead recall was issued due to a risk of insulation failure. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About St. Jude Riata Lead Lawsuit A St. Jude Riata defibrillator lead recall was issued due to a risk of insulation failure. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The St. Jude Riata leads were removed from the market in late 2010, amid reports that the insulation surrounding the wires was prone to corrode and fail, resulting in exposed wires inside the body. According to a scheduling order (PDF) issued earlier this year, a consolidated trial has been scheduled for February 3, 2015, involving two different cases. It is hoped that the bellwether trial will help the parties gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that is likely to be similar to what will be presented throughout the St. Jude Riata litigation. The parties are scheduled to meet with Judge Selna again next month for a status conference, and a settlement conference has been scheduled for September 12, 2014. Although the outcome of this bellwether trial will not be binding on other cases, it may help facilitate St. Jude Riata settlement agreements in a large number of cases pending throughout the country. St. Jude Riata Litigation Although a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) has not been established for all St. Jude Riata cases pending throughout the country, cases pending in the Central District of California have been centralized before Judge Selna to reduce duplicative discovery, avoid contradictory pretrial rulings from different judges and to serve the convenience of the witnesses, parties and the court. Judge Selna has ruled that the first trial will be a joint trial of two different cases; a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the parents of Daniel Calise, and an injury lawsuit brought by Michael Thomson. The Calise complaint (PDF) was filed by Rose and Paul Calise, who claim that their 23-year-old son died on September 17, 2011 from cardiopulmonary arrest due to the failure of his St. Jude Riata lead. They blame the lead’s failure on defective design and manufacturing. The Thompson complaint (PDF) claims that a doctor advised him in April 2012 that his Riata lead was failing and that it needed to be replaced. Thompson indicates that due to the defective lead, he required risky revision surgery via laser extraction, which has caused him to suffer injury, medical expenses, and other damages. St. Jude opposed the consolidation of the two cases for one trial, arguing that having the cases go before the same jury would be unduly prejudicial. Judge Selna has indicated that the defendants may request another opportunity to argue for separate trials before the cases begin early next year. St. Jude Riata Lead Recall The St. Jude Riata leads are connected to implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD), to monitor the heart and apply corrective electrical shocks when heart rhythm problems are detected. Amid reports that suggested the insulation was failing on some leads, the company suspended sales of the St. Jude Riata and Riata ST ICD leads in late 2010. The company then issued a warning to doctors about the risk of St. Jude Riata lead insulation failure in late 2011. The FDA determined that the actions constituted a St. Jude Riata recall in December 2011. Approximately 227,000 St. Jude Riata wires were sold worldwide before it was removed from the market, and estimates suggest that more than 70,000 of the leads remain active in patients in the United States, as the process of attempting to remove the lead is very risky and doctors usually recommend keeping the recalled lead in place unless there is evidence that it has failed. In August 2012, the FDA issued a safety communication in response to concerns among individuals who still have one of the recalled St. Jude Riata or Riata ST leads, recommending that individuals undergo x-ray or other imaging exams to monitor the condition of the leads. The FDA has ordered the company to conduct additional studies on the potential risk of insulation failures and problems with the debrillator leads, including the newer versions sold under the Riata ST Optim and Durata names. Tags: Defibrillator, Defibrillator Lead, Riata, St. Jude Image Credit: | More St. Jude Riata Lead Lawsuit Stories Leadless Pacemakers May Have Lower Complications Rates: Study October 20, 2021 St. Jude Defibrillator Lawsuit Alleges Device Failure Resulted in Fatal Auto Accident October 5, 2017 Implanted Defibrillators Linked To High Risk Of Complications: Study May 9, 2016 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermNameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (Posted: today) A federal judge is expediting Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits towards resolution by permitting direct filing of new claims with the MDL court and appointing numerous plaintiffs’ attorneys to leadership roles. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUIT75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)Depo-Provera Side Effects May Increase Risk of Rare, Severe Blood Clots, Case Report Warns (03/05/2025)Depo-Provera Injury Lawyers To Apply for Leadership Positions in MDL (03/03/2025) Up to 100 Suboxone Tooth Decay Claims Can Be Filed on Single Lawsuit in MDL: Judge (Posted: yesterday) The U.S. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Lawyers Report on Status of Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay, Dental Damage (03/11/2025)Medical Records of Suboxone Tooth Decay Must Be Produced Under MDL Court Order (02/20/2025)Lawyers in Suboxone Dental Lawsuits Fail To Reach Agreement on Bellwether Selection Process (02/06/2025) Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 (Posted: 4 days ago) Parties involved in Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits indicate they are ready to meet with a mediator in a couple weeks to begin potential settlement negotiations. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Hernia Mesh Settlement Talks To Get Underway After Parties Select Mediator Next Week (02/19/2025)Discovery Deadlines in Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Extended by MDL Judge (12/12/2024)Court Appoints Bard Hernia Mesh Settlement Special Masters To Implement “Intensive” Process To Resolve Claims (11/22/2024)
St. Jude Defibrillator Lawsuit Alleges Device Failure Resulted in Fatal Auto Accident October 5, 2017
Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (Posted: today) A federal judge is expediting Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits towards resolution by permitting direct filing of new claims with the MDL court and appointing numerous plaintiffs’ attorneys to leadership roles. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUIT75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)Depo-Provera Side Effects May Increase Risk of Rare, Severe Blood Clots, Case Report Warns (03/05/2025)Depo-Provera Injury Lawyers To Apply for Leadership Positions in MDL (03/03/2025)
Up to 100 Suboxone Tooth Decay Claims Can Be Filed on Single Lawsuit in MDL: Judge (Posted: yesterday) The U.S. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Lawyers Report on Status of Lawsuits Over Tooth Decay, Dental Damage (03/11/2025)Medical Records of Suboxone Tooth Decay Must Be Produced Under MDL Court Order (02/20/2025)Lawyers in Suboxone Dental Lawsuits Fail To Reach Agreement on Bellwether Selection Process (02/06/2025)
Mediation To Discuss Settling Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Set for March 31 Through April 4 (Posted: 4 days ago) Parties involved in Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits indicate they are ready to meet with a mediator in a couple weeks to begin potential settlement negotiations. MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Hernia Mesh Settlement Talks To Get Underway After Parties Select Mediator Next Week (02/19/2025)Discovery Deadlines in Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Extended by MDL Judge (12/12/2024)Court Appoints Bard Hernia Mesh Settlement Special Masters To Implement “Intensive” Process To Resolve Claims (11/22/2024)