Stryker LFit Hip Problems Lead to Warning Notice Over Femoral Head Failures
Amid a higher-than-expected number of reports involving Stryker hip replacement problems, the manufacturer has issued a warning to doctors about the risk of femoral head and hip stem dissociation linked to certain older LFIT V40 components.
In a product safety notification (PDF) released late last month, Stryker indicates that an increased risk of premature failure and other problems appear to affect certain sizes of Anatomic CoCR V4o Femoral Heads manufactured before March 4, 2011.
The Stryker LFit v40 is a femoral head used in several hip replacement systems, which was removed from the market in late 2016, following reports of taper lock problems with the cobalt-chromium femoral head that may result in pain, inflammation, loss of mobility, disassociation and the need for risky revision surgery.
The latest warning indicates that the femoral head/hip stem dissociations could cause a number of complications, including:
- Peri-prosthetic fracture
- The need for revision surgery
- Leg length discrepancy
- Loss of mobility
- Inflammatory response
- Adverse local tissue reaction
Stryker recommends that patients implanted with these products be followed up as normal through their surgeons, but is not recommending any changes to how frequently those follow-ups occur.
The company urges hospitals and surgeons to ensure that those working with these products be informed of this latest warning. A full list of femoral heads affected by the warning is included in the product safety notification.
Stryker LFit Litigation
The warning comes as Stryker faces more than 270 Stryker LFit V40 lawsuits filed in federal courts nationwide.
Given similar questions of fact and law raised in cases filed nationwide, all hip replacement lawsuits involving issues with the Stryker LFit v30 have been centralized before U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, as part of an MDL or multidistrict litigation.
If Stryker hip settlements are not reached following the discovery process, the Court indicates that the first bellwether trial will commence on September 16, 2019.
While the outcome of such bellwether trials are not binding on other plaintiffs, they are closely watched in complex product liability litigation, where large numbers of cases raise similar allegations and injury claims.
Similar centralized proceedings were previously established in the federal court system following a 2012 Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II recall, which resulted in thousands of lawsuits brought by individuals nationwide. Following coordinated discovery in that litigation, the manufacturer agreed to pay more than $1 billion in hip implant settlements to resolve cases for individuals who required revision surgery after these recalled implant failed.
"*" indicates required fields
More Top Stories
Uber faces a lawsuit from four passengers who say they were sexually assaulted by drivers, due to the company's lack of security measures and focus on passenger safety.
A Bard PowerPort lawsuit claims the defective design of the port catheter led to a woman developing a severe infection and needing to have the implant surgically removed.
The new federal judge overseeing all talcum powder lawsuits has called for a Science Day to educate the court ahead of planned Daubert hearings which could decide if bellwether test trials can move forward.