Stryker LFit Hip Problems Lead to Warning Notice Over Femoral Head Failures

Amid a higher-than-expected number of reports involving Stryker hip replacement problems, the manufacturer has issued a warning to doctors about the risk of femoral head and hip stem dissociation linked to certain older LFIT V40 components.ย 

In a product safety notification (PDF) released late last month, Stryker indicates that an increased risk of premature failure and other problems appear to affect certain sizes of Anatomic CoCR V4o Femoral Heads manufactured before March 4, 2011.

The Stryker LFit v40 is a femoral head used in several hip replacement systems, which was removed from the market in late 2016, following reports of taper lock problems with the cobalt-chromium femoral head that may result in pain, inflammation, loss of mobility, disassociation and the need for risky revision surgery.

"*" indicates required fields

"*" indicates required fields

The latest warning indicates that the femoral head/hip stem dissociations could cause a number of complications, including:

  • Dislocation
  • Pain
  • Peri-prosthetic fracture
  • The need for revision surgery
  • Leg length discrepancy
  • Loss of mobility
  • Inflammatory response
  • Adverse local tissue reaction

Stryker recommends that patients implanted with these products be followed up as normal through their surgeons, but is not recommending any changes to how frequently those follow-ups occur.

The company urges hospitals and surgeons to ensure that those working with these products be informed of this latest warning. A full list of femoral heads affected by the warning is included in the product safety notification.

Stryker LFit Litigation

The warning comes as Stryker faces more than 270 Stryker LFit V40 lawsuits filed in federal courts nationwide.

Given similar questions of fact and law raised in cases filed nationwide, allย hip replacement lawsuitsย involving issues with the Stryker LFit v30 have been centralized before U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, as part of an MDL or multidistrict litigation.

If Stryker hip settlements are not reached following the discovery process, the Court indicates that the first bellwether trial will commence on September 16, 2019.

While the outcome of such bellwether trials are not binding on other plaintiffs, they are closely watched in complex product liability litigation, where large numbers of cases raise similar allegations and injury claims.

Similar centralized proceedings were previously established in the federal court system following a 2012ย Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II recall, which resulted in thousands of lawsuits brought by individuals nationwide. Following coordinated discovery in that litigation, the manufacturer agreed to pay more than $1 billion inย hip implant settlementsย to resolve cases for individuals who required revision surgery after these recalled implant failed.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.
Lawsuit alleges Olympus failed to address known problems with sterilizing duodenoscopes, leading to a fatal ERCP infection years after federal regulators first raised concerns about the devices.