Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Taser Lawsuit Alleges Use of Unreasonable and Excessive Force September 17, 2010 Staff Writers Add Your CommentsA Texas man has filed a police brutality lawsuit against the police officer and police department that he says shot him with a Taser stun gun unnecessarily, as well as a product liability lawsuit against the company that manufactured the weapon.ย The Taser lawsuit was filed on August 30 by Mark Anthony Hadnot, in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. The lawsuit alleges that Officer John A. Fuller of the Woodville Police Department used unnecessary force when he stunned Hadnot in his home with a stun gun manufactured by Taser International.Hadnot is claiming that the incident was a civil rights violation. According to a report by The Southeast Texas Record, Officer Fuller had been questioning Hadnot for several minutes in his home when he told the officer that he needed to use the restroom. When Hadnot stood to go relieve himself, Officer Fuller shot him with the Taser, delivering an electro-muscular shock that is designed to disrupt a person’s neuromuscular function.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe lawsuit accuses Officer Fuller of using unreasonable and excessive force in the situation. The police department allegedly failed to train or discipline its officers and failed to investigate claims of excessive force. The lawsuit also accuses Taser International of not informing officers that the Taser weapon was for self-defense only and not to be used as a means of forcing compliance, and for making a defective product that is capable of causing severe injury or death.Hadnot is seeking compensation for physical and mental pain and suffering, as well as punitive damages, court costs and attorney fees.Scottsdale, Arizona-based Taser International has vigorously defended the safety of their stun gun weapons, and is usually successful in having itself dismissed from lawsuits of this nature. Although the company has maintained that the charge delivered by the stun gun is not life-threatening, a number of deaths have occurred shortly after individuals have been Tasered.In 2008, Amnesty International released a report on Taser police use, calling for departments throughout the United States to stop using Taser guns or to strictly limit their use to life-threatening situations. The human rights group linked 334 deaths to the use of Taser guns between 2001 and August 2008. Amnesty noted that 90% of the Taser deaths examined involved people who were unarmed and did not appear to present a serious threat to the officers. A large number of the fatalities involved misuse of the weapons, including multiple Taser shocks or exposing suspects to prolonged shocks. Tags: Defective Product, Police, Police Brutality, Product Liability, Stun Gun, Taser, Taser Gun, Texas Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Problems Caused Burning, Shocks, Lawsuit Alleges October 16, 2026 Olympus Medical Device Warning Letter Follows FDA Inspections of Six Manufacturing Facilities October 16, 2026 Dupixent Cancer Risks Lead Experts to Recommend Skin Biopsies Before Treatment October 16, 2026 2 Comments Excited-Delirium blog September 20, 2010 It’s worth noting that Taser International, in their latest “Training” package, has finally stepped across the line and admitted that tasers can affect the heart if a dart happens to “near the heart”. And they confess that the risks include death. These legal warnings are ever so slowly microstep tip-toeing towards the truth, that tasers are not as safe as they had previously claimed. One has to pay attention to see the subtle drift in their legal warnings. Note also that they caved and settled the Butler case for about $3M. They caved because they would have lost. Note also that they’ve silently retracted Kroll’s “Cardiac Safety” page from their website. That’s the infamous ‘ping pong’ paper. The tide has certainly shifted. julie September 18, 2010 All we ever hear from Amnesty International, is how many deaths (324 so they claim) have been linked to tasers. Do they ever tell us how many deaths there have been been 2001 and 2008 related to GUN deaths. LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Problems Caused Burning, Shocks, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: yesterday)A Georgia womanโs spinal cord stimulator lawsuit alleges she suffered painful shocks and permanent injuries after an Abbott device’s leads migrated out of position.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMaster Complaint for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Filed (10/12/2026)Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (10/05/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026) Dozens File Joint Nitrous Oxide Addiction Lawsuit Against Amazon, Third-Party Retailers (Posted: 2 days ago)A joint nitrous oxide addiction lawsuit accuses Amazon and numerous third-party retailers of knowingly selling nitrous oxide for illegal recreational use.MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITNitrous Oxide Injury Lawsuit Filed Over B12 Deficiency, Long-Term Side Effects (10/09/2026)Amazon, Online Nitrous Oxide Sellers Face Class Action Lawsuit Over Health and Safety Risks (09/04/2026)Nitrous Oxide Sales Restrictions Pass California Legislature Amid Growing Abuse Concerns (09/02/2026) Fourth Bard PowerPort Bellwether Case Set for Trial Dec. 1, as Third Gets Underway (Posted: 3 days ago)A federal judge has scheduled a fourth Bard PowerPort bellwether trial to begin on December 1, while the third trial is slated to begin on October 13.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJudge Clears Bard PowerPort Lawsuit for Trial, Rejecting Motion for Summary Judgment (10/02/2026)Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (09/14/2026)Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (09/09/2026)
Olympus Medical Device Warning Letter Follows FDA Inspections of Six Manufacturing Facilities October 16, 2026
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Problems Caused Burning, Shocks, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: yesterday)A Georgia womanโs spinal cord stimulator lawsuit alleges she suffered painful shocks and permanent injuries after an Abbott device’s leads migrated out of position.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMaster Complaint for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Filed (10/12/2026)Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (10/05/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026)
Dozens File Joint Nitrous Oxide Addiction Lawsuit Against Amazon, Third-Party Retailers (Posted: 2 days ago)A joint nitrous oxide addiction lawsuit accuses Amazon and numerous third-party retailers of knowingly selling nitrous oxide for illegal recreational use.MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITNitrous Oxide Injury Lawsuit Filed Over B12 Deficiency, Long-Term Side Effects (10/09/2026)Amazon, Online Nitrous Oxide Sellers Face Class Action Lawsuit Over Health and Safety Risks (09/04/2026)Nitrous Oxide Sales Restrictions Pass California Legislature Amid Growing Abuse Concerns (09/02/2026)
Fourth Bard PowerPort Bellwether Case Set for Trial Dec. 1, as Third Gets Underway (Posted: 3 days ago)A federal judge has scheduled a fourth Bard PowerPort bellwether trial to begin on December 1, while the third trial is slated to begin on October 13.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJudge Clears Bard PowerPort Lawsuit for Trial, Rejecting Motion for Summary Judgment (10/02/2026)Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (09/14/2026)Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (09/09/2026)