Taxotere Breast Cancer Drug Lawsuit Filed Over Permanent Hair Loss

|

The makers of the breast cancer drug Taxotere face a growing number of hair loss lawsuits filed on behalf of women nationwide, who allege they were not adequately warned that hair may not regrow following chemotherapy, and that equally effective alternative treatments were available that do not carry the same risk. 

One of the latest lawsuits was filed by Carol Webb, of Gretna, Louisiana, who filed her complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on June 17.

Like other lawsuits over hair loss from Taxotere, Webb alleges that Sanofi-Aventis knew or should have known about the risk when they introduced the high-potency taxane-based drug, yet failed to adequately warn women and the medical community, while promoting use of their newer medication, even though it is no more effective than older breast cancer treatments that were already on the market.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Webb indicates that she was diagnosed with infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the right breast in January 2010, and began chemotherapy treatment that included Taxotere in September 2010. Following the use of the breast cancer drug, Webb indicates that her hair has never regrown, leaving her with a permanent and disfiguring condition known as permanent alopecia.

The lawsuit notes that the manufacturers failed to disclose information about the link between Taxotere and permanent hair loss, providing false and misleading information that suggested hair would regrow following use of the breast cancer drug. Webb points to research available as early as 2005, including a study known as GEICAM 9805, which found that nearly one out of every 10 patients treated with Taxotere suffered hair loss that lasted up to 10 years and five months following chemotherapy, and in some cases longer.

Webb also points out that Taxotere carries warnings about the risk of permanent hair loss in some other countries, but those same warnings are not provided to consumers or doctors in the United States.

“Despite the fact that Defendants disclosed risks associated with Taxotere and permanent alopecia to patients and regulatory agencies in other countries, Defendants failed to either alert Plaintiff, the public, and the scientific community in the United States or perform further investigation into the safety of Taxotere regarding the side effect of disfiguring permanent alopecia,” the lawsuit states. “Defendants failed to update the warnings for Taxotere, and they failed to disclose the results of additional studies as Defendants learned new facts regarding the defects and risks of their product.”

Webb’s complaint and other lawsuits point out that while women may have accepted the Taxotere risk of permanent hair loss if no other treatment options were available, this was not the case, as similar drugs on the market at the time Taxotere was introduced provided the same treatment benefits without subjecting female users to the same risk of permanent hair loss.

Webb presents claims of defective design, inadequate warning, and breach of warranty.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Parties involved in a Dupixent T-cell lymphoma wrongful death lawsuit will participate in an initial status conference in early December, to map out how the litigation will move forward.
A group of plaintiffs are asking a panel of federal judges to consolidate all Lyft lawsuits involving driver sexual assaults against passengers before one judge as part of a Lyft MDL.
Federal regulators warned years ago that mesh implants were never approved for use in breast surgery, yet manufacturers continued marketing them as internal bra devices for reconstruction and cosmetic augmentation.