Skip Navigation

Tesla Fire Lawsuit Claims Battery Defects Caused Vehicle’s ‘Spontaneous Combustion’

Tesla Fire Lawsuit Claims Vehicle's 'Spontaneous Combustion' Was Result of Battery Defects

An Oregon woman has filed a product liability lawsuit, alleging her Tesla vehicle suddenly caught fire while she was driving, causing her to lose control and crash.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Maria Salcedo in Oregon Circuit Court on May 1, naming Tesla Inc. as the sole defendant. The case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon on May 18.

Salcedo claims the Tesla caught fire without warning while she was driving with her children and a friend, causing a crash that left her with a concussion, severe psychological trauma and injuries requiring surgery. Her passenger, Jewlien Battles, allegedly helped Salcedo and her children escape the burning vehicle, suffering permanent second-degree burns to his hands, arms, neck and abdomen, as well as a concussion.

Tesla Battery Fire Risks

According to the complaint, the fire was due to a dangerously defective battery system that allegedly caused the vehicle’s lithium-ion battery to spontaneously combust.

Similar allegations of battery fires have been raised in other lawsuits involving Tesla cars and trucks. In one case, a California man claims he suffered severe and life threatening injuries when the electronic door locks on his Tesla Model Y failed after the vehicle crashed and caught fire, preventing his escape.

In a separate wrongful death lawsuit, the daughters of a California man allege malfunctioning electronic door handles in a 2023 Tesla Model Y trapped their father inside the burning vehicle after it crashed while on Autopilot.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Tesla Battery Fire Allegations

Salcedo alleges that on January 8, 2025, she was driving her Tesla under normal conditions when the vehicle suddenly caught fire without warning, causing her to lose control and strike a median barrier.

Battles, who was a passenger, then assisted Salcedo and her children in escaping the burning vehicle, sustaining substantial permanent second degree burns to his hands, arms, neck and abdomen, along with a concussion. Salcedo also suffered a concussion and psychological trauma requiring surgical treatment.

The complaint further states that Salcedo involuntarily urinated on herself from the impact and fear, and now suffers from nightmares, anxiety and a persistent fear of driving or riding in vehicles after witnessing her children and friend nearly perish in the fire.

Salcedo claims the fire was caused by defects in the vehicle’s battery or energy management system and was not the result of driver error or any outside force.

“Plaintiff alleges that Tesla’s design, manufacturing, and/or failure to warn of the dangers of its vehicle’s energy systems directly resulted in the fire, injuries, and resulting trauma.”

— Maria Salcedo v. Tesla Inc.

The lawsuit raises allegations of product liability and negligence. It seeks at least $250,000 in general damages, more than $50,000 in medical expenses and over $500,000 in non-economic damages for pain, suffering and emotional distress, along with interest, costs and other relief the court deems appropriate.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Darian Hauf
Written By: Darian Hauf

Consumer Safety & Recall News Writer

Darian Hauf is a consumer safety writer at AboutLawsuits.com, where she covers product recalls, public health alerts, and regulatory updates from agencies like the FDA and CPSC. She contributes research and reporting support on emerging safety concerns affecting households and consumers nationwide.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.

About the writer

Darian Hauf

Darian Hauf

Darian Hauf is a consumer safety writer at AboutLawsuits.com, where she covers product recalls, public health alerts, and regulatory updates from agencies like the FDA and CPSC. She contributes research and reporting support on emerging safety concerns affecting households and consumers nationwide.