A lawsuit against both the makers of the Ventralight and Proceed hernia mesh claims they are all defective due to the use of polypropylene, which causes problems when used in…
A product liability lawsuit claims five different hernia mesh patches manufactured by Bard and Ethicon all failed since 2010, leaving a man disabled and with permanent injuries.
A number of recent Ethicon Proceed mesh lawsuits filed in New Jersey say the hernia patch is defective and increases the risk of injury and the need for revision surgery.
An Ethicon Proceed mesh lawsuit claims the hernia patch was defectively designed, leading to an increased risk of failure and complications.
The New Jersey Supreme Court is considering consolidation of all Ethicon Proceed and Prolene hernia mesh complication lawsuits in that state for pretrial proceedings.
An Ethicon Proceed hernia mesh lawsuit claims that complications resulted in the need for revision surgery after just one day.
An Ethicon Proceed lawsuit claims that the hernia patches are defectively designed after a Pennsylvania woman suffered severe injuries, infections and complications after three of them failed.
A product liability lawsuit cites design defects in Ethicon Proceed and Prolene hernia mesh patches which resulted in severe injuries and the need for revision surgery for a Florida woman.
A hernia mesh lawsuit indicates that problems with the Ethicon Physiomesh and Ethicon Proceed mesh resulted in numerous complications, revision surgeries and additional procedures due to their defective design.
An Ethicon Proceed hernia mesh lawsuit claims that the patch is defective and prone to adhesions, failure and the need for revision surgery.
