Bard Ventralight And Ethicon Proceed Hernia Mesh Products Both Failed, Lawsuit Claims

According to allegations raised in a lawsuit filed this month against both Ethicon and C.R. Bard, each of the manufacturers sold defective hernia mesh products that failed, resulting in painful and severe complications following hernia repair.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Robert Bray in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island on November 1, indicating that both an Ethicon Proceed Ventral Patch and Bard Ventralight ST Mesh failed, causing him to suffer permanent injuries.

Bray indicates that he underwent a ventral hernia repair procedure in February 2012. At that time, he was implanted with a 4.3 cm x 4.3 cm Proceed Ventral Patch. However, the hernia mesh failed and surgeons removed the patch in April 2017. Several months later, in September 2017, Bray had the Ventralight ST Mesh implanted, which also failed.

Learn More About

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

Cases reviewed for problems with several types of hernia repair products.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See if you qualify for a settlement

The lawsuit indicates the problems with both products were caused by the polypropylene mesh designs, which Bray says have not been shown to improve quality of life for recipients over traditional non-mesh repairs. According to his complaint, the manufacturers also ignored numerous signs of problems with the materials used in mesh products, which have been shown to be problematic in the human body.

“Defendants were fully aware of the dangers defective products they were placing into the stream of commerce posed to their customers, specifically the Mesh Products polypropylene mesh, which has been shown to pose an unreasonable risk of human body inflammation, granuloma formation, foreign body reaction, excessive scar tissue formation and long-term complications,” the lawsuit states. “Despite the abundance of scientific and medical information available relating to the dangerous properties and serious risks of the Mesh Products, Defendants deliberately ignored these dangers and aggressively promoted the Mesh Products polypropylene mesh to healthcare providers and/or directly to consumers.”

The case joins a growing number of similar Ethicon hernia mesh lawsuits and  Bard hernia patch lawsuits pending in courts nationwide.

As lawyer continue to review and file cases in the coming months and years, it is ultimately expected that tens of thousands of hernia mesh lawsuits will eventually be filed against various different companies by individuals who received various polypropylene products in recent years.


  • KerriJuly 16, 2020 at 11:24 pm

    Is this still an active lawsuit in ohio? My father had ventralight mesh that caused bowel blockage. He died from complications of surgery for blockage caused by the mesh in 2018

"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer
Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer "Representative" (Posted 2 days ago)

Bard claims two cases selected for the third and fourth bellwether trials are no longer representative of the litigation due to the plaintiffs' worsening injuries and need for additional surgeries due to their failed hernia mesh products.