Toyota Recall Lawsuits Result in $1.4B Settlement Over Acceleration

Toyota has reached an agreement to pay $1.4 billion to settle lawsuits claiming that recalls issued for millions of vehicles, due to problems with sudden unintended acceleration, lowered the value of consumers’ Toyota and Lexus vehicles. 

In a quarterly report issued this week, the Japanese automaker noted that it was taking a $1.1 billion charge for the recall settlement, which must be approved by a California judge. According to a report by Bloomberg News, the total costs of the settlement may reach $1.4 billion to resolve the lawsuits.

Sudden acceleration problems with Toyota vehicles led to the recall of millions of Toyota and Lexus vehicles in 2009 and early 2010. Those recalls were issued in several waves, starting with 3.8 million vehicles recalled for floor mat problems in September 2009, followed by other recalls that eventually affected a total of more than 13 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Following the recalls, Toyota faced a number of lawsuits filed on behalf of individuals involved in accidents caused by unintended acceleration of vehicles. However, a number of class action complaints and individual lawsuits were also filed on behalf of owners of Toyota vehicles who claimed that their vehicles lost value due to the recall problems.

According to allegations raised in the lawsuits, much of the appeal of owning a Toyota for many was the belief that the vehicles lose less value over time when compared to other cars, due to the prior safety record. Plaintiffs claimed that the Toyota recalls, and a government investigation that revealed that the company dragged its feet after it knew there was a problem, hurt the value of their cars.

Recalls, Government Investigations, Damaged Toyota Image

In December, 2011 the U.S. Department of Transportation announced that Toyota was being fined $32.4 million following two federal investigations into how it handled unintended acceleration recalls and steering rod defects.

Government investigators say the company stalled on the recalls and failed to notify federal safety officials about the problems in a timely manner. The fines were the maximum allowed by law.

The Toyota recall settlement includes $250 million in cash for former owners who sold vehicles affected by the recalls, and another $250 million for those who still own an affected vehicle. It also covers any Toyota that had an electronic throttle control system, which many lawsuits alleged was defective and caused the acceleration problems.

Also included in the settlement is the cost of installing brake override systems in 3.25 million vehicles, to prevent out-of-control acceleration problems in the future. Another $200 million will be paid in attorney fees.

The settlement does not include Toyota personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits filed by people who were hurt or by the families of those killed when their Toyota vehicles raced out of control and crashed.

Hundreds of those cases have been centralized and consolidated under Judge James V. Selna for pretrial proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Santa Ana as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL). The first trial is slated to begin in February 2013.

Photo Courtesy of: / CC BY 2.0


  • JerryMarch 23, 2015 at 8:52 pm

    Hybrid failure twice resulted in complete stalls in heavy 8traffic. Told it was "software glitch" 2007 Highlander purchasefdnew in 2007 turned out to be potential death trap. Looking for class action lawsuit to join as Toyots to date has been difficult to take responsibility. I was told my car wasn't part of recall sev yrs ago snd that my car "was safe to dtive"

  • sam alstonJune 14, 2013 at 5:03 pm

    i owned a 2004 Lexus ES 330 am i apart of the toyota class action suit?

  • LarryApril 10, 2013 at 4:13 pm

    I own a 1997 Toyota Tundra. how can I be apart of this Class Action Lawsuit?

  • LynneJanuary 18, 2013 at 12:56 pm

    How do you know if you are part of this Class Action Suit - I had a 2008 Toyota Avalon and was never notified that I might be part of the suit. I traded it in May 2012.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal (Posted yesterday)

A BioZorb lawsuit has been filed by several breast cancer survivors after the BioZorb implants moved out of place and failed to dissolve int he body, requiring surgical removal.

Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October
Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October (Posted yesterday)

A U.S. District Court judge has scheduled a fairness hearing for October in order to determine whether final approval should be granted to a $25 million Philips CPAP recall settlement agreement, which would pay former users $25 million to pay for future medical monitoring needs.

Abbott Laboratories Faces Jury Trial Over Claims Similac Caused NEC For Premature Infant
Abbott Laboratories Faces Jury Trial Over Claims Similac Caused NEC For Premature Infant (Posted 2 days ago)

Following a $60 million verdict in a similar lawsuit earlier this year, trial is underway involving claims brought by an Illinois mother, whose premature daughter developed NEC from Similac, alleging that Abbott failed to warn parents and medical staff of the devastating risks associated with the cow's milk-based formula.