Uloric Removed From Market Following Years of Concerns About Potential Health Risks

Uloric Removed From Market Following Years Of Concerns About Potential Health Risks

Following more than five years of safety concerns about potential side effects from Uloric, and growing competition from other generic gout treatments, Takeda Pharmaceuticals has decided to remove Uloric from the market in the United States.

In an update on drug shortages published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on January 22, the agency announced that Uloric has been discontinued. Takeda officials have stated the market removal was due to dropping sales amid competition from generic versions of the drug, but the move comes after critics previously called for a Uloric recall to be issued.

Uloric (febuxostat) was first approved in 2009, for the treatment of high uric acid levels in the body associated with gout. Amid aggressive marketing, the drug rapidly became a blockbuster treatment in the United States.

However, growing evidence has emerged that established a link between Uloric and heart risks, leading the FDA to require new warning information to be added to the drug label in 2019, and a number of Uloric lawsuits have been filed by former users of the drug, alleging they may have avoided a heart attack, stroke or other injuries by using a different treatment for gout.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

According to Takeda, the launch of generic versions of Uloric resulted in only 3% of users actually buying and using the brand name version since 2019. However, those low sale numbers have been helped along by several FDA warnings over the years, which linked Uloric side effects to an increased risk of heart attack, stroke and other cardiovascular risks.

In February 2019, the FDA announced that the drug must carry the strongest label warning the agency can require a drug maker to place on their product, adding a Uloric “black box” warning about the risk of cardiovascular problems, which was not adequately reflected by the drug maker in the past.

This led to the consumer watchdog group Public Citizen to petition for a Uloric recall in 2019, which argued that the drug’s benefits treating gout did not justify the risk of dying from Uloric heart problems.

That same year, an FDA advisory committee meeting resulted in a 19 to 2 vote to advise the agency to make Uloric a second-line gout drug, meaning it was reserved for patients who had not responded positively to other gout medications first.

Takeda informed the FDA last year that it planned to discontinue the drug. However, to help patients’ transition to other medications, the company indicates it will continue to provide U.S. wholesalers with Uloric until March 31, 2026.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A federal judge has called for a second census of Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits and will require prompt filing of census forms for claims filed from October 1 forward.
A new lawsuit against Roblox alleges that the platform’s inadequate safety measures enabled multiple sexual predators to exploit a five-year-old girl.
Breast mesh implants promoted as internal bras are now under scrutiny, following studies and FDA warnings linking the devices to infections, implant loss, and surgical failure. Lawsuits are being investigated for women who suffered complications after reconstruction or augmentation procedures involving products like GalaFLEX, Phasix, Strattice, and AlloDerm.