RSS
TwitterFacebook

Valsartan Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Manufacturers Over Cancer Risks

  • Written by: Irvin Jackson
  • 2 Comments

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Following a recent string of massive recalls involving generic valsartan, a class action lawsuit has been been filed against several drug manufacturers and pharmacies, seeking compensation for consumers who paid for the contaminated pills, believing them to be safe.

Elizabeth and John Duffey filed the complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on August 16, seeking class action status against Solco Healthcare, Prinston Pharmaceutical, Walgreens, and Throgg Neck Pharmacy.

Duffey took valsartan pills made and distributed by the defendants for years before recent recalls were issued, due to contamination with the impurity N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), which has been linked a risk of liver cancer, kidney cancer and other types of cancer.

The initial valsartan recall was announced by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on July 5, after batches of the active ingredient supplied by Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceuticals in China, tested positive for NDMA. That initial recall affected about 2,300 batches of valsartan and valsartan HCT shipped throughout Europe and Canada.

The FDA followed with its own recall announcement on July 13, indicating that the agency had launched an investigation to determine the scope of the contamination and the potential risk to consumers.

The agency determined that a number of manufacturers have been distributing the contaminated pills for years. Like the EMA, the FDA also noted NDMA has been linked to cancer risks in animal studies and that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that consuming up to 96 nanograms of NDMA per day is considered reasonably safe for human ingestion.

“Plaintiffs and the Class were injured by the full purchase price of their valsartan-containing medications,” the lawsuit states. “These medications are worthless, as they are contaminated with carcinogenic and harmful NDMA and are not fit for human consumption.”

The complaint estimates that hundreds of thousands of consumers nationwide were exposed to the contaminated pills before they were recalled and seeks class action status. The lawsuit presents claims of breach of warranty, unjust enrichment, fraud, fraudulent concealment, strict products liability, gross negligence, negligence, battery and violation of New York’s General Business Law.

While this class action seeks to represent patients who have not yet been diagnosed with cancer, a number of consumers who have been diagnosed with liver cancer, kidney cancer, lung cancer or suffered an acute liver injury in recent years are now reviewing whether they may be eligible for compensation through a valsartan lawsuit against the manufacturers of the generic drug, with lawyers providing free consultations and case evaluations for individuals nationwide.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

2 comments

  1. Susan Reply

    Yes, I too took Valsartan and have had cancer
    Of Colon & ovaries. I had full genetic testing and all my genes were okay…so assume my
    Cancers were caused by environmental factors. Didn’t know Valsartan was a problem.

  2. Norma Reply

    Took Valsartan from October, 2015 until March 2018. I felt poorly most of 2017 and was diagnosed with stage 4 large cell lung cancer in April 2018.
    The pharmacist said the company manufacturing my prescription had a recall in July 2018.
    Since April, I have had chemo, radiation and am currently on Immunotherapy. This is the first health problem I’ve had, it’s a very difficult time for me and my family.

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact A Lawyer

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.