DOJ Intervenes in Vascular Solutions Whistleblower Lawsuit

|

Federal prosecutors have decided to intervene in a whistleblower lawsuit filed against Vascular Solutions, which alleges that the company illegally marketed its Vari-Lase medical device for unapproved uses.ย 

The complaint was originally brought by a former Vascular Solutions employee, Desalle Bui, claiming to have proof that the company promoted the Vari-Lase Short Kit for uses other than treating perforated veins, which is the only indication approved by the FDA.

The off-label marketing lawsuit alleges that Vascular Solutions’ illegal promotion has cost the government $20 million in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

The Department of Justice had the option of intervening or letting the former employee stand alone. However, Vascular Solutions reported last week that the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas has decided to take part in the case.

Under federal laws, manufacturers of drugs and medical devices are only allowed to promote their products for medical uses that have been approved by the FDA. However, doctors are permitted to prescribe drugs or medical devices for whatever uses they see fit once they are on the market.

The Vari-Lase is an endovenous laser system that has brought in about $410,0000 in sales for the company. It is used to treat varicose veigns and varicosities. However, the lawsuit claims that the company paid doctors kickbacks to get them to buy it and use it for other uses.

Under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act, whistleblowers who report a false claim against the government may be entitled to receive a portion of any money that the government recovers. In return, the whistleblower must be the first to bring the case to the governmentโ€™s attention, and must not publicize the claim until the DOJ decides to prosecute the claim.

The company has indicated that the lawsuit is without merit, but says it will comply with the investigation. The details of the lawsuit, first file in November 2010, were unsealed last week.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

At least three Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits were filed this week, making it the latest manufacturer to face multiple claims alleging the implants are defectively designed.
Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis agree with calls to consolidate all Dupixent cancer lawsuits currently spread throughout the federal court system before one judge.