Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Safety Group Releases 2015 “Worst Toys” List Before Christmas December 7, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsA consumer advocacy and protection group has released a list of the most dangerous toys on the market this holiday season, indicating that they may pose a risk of various injuries, from choking and strangulation, to allergies and far too realistic toy guns.ย The non-profit organization World Against Toys Causing Harm Inc. (W.A.T.C.H.) released their 43rd annual โ10 Worst Toysโ report last month, urging parents to be aware of the dangers associated with several harmful toys that should be kept out of childrenโs hands.W.A.T.C.H. is encouraging parents and guardians to carefully select the toys they will be purchasing for children and to always inspect them before allowing children to play with the products.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAccording to the group, research has shown that there is a child treated at an emergency room in the U.S. every three minutes for a toy-related injury. The group says those injuries could have been prevented if parents had fully inspected the potential dangers of the toy, or had been rendering supervision while the toy was played with.Many popular consumer watchdog groups have become concerned with the safety of todayโs toys and have identified the toy industry for a growing number of emergency room visits over the last two decades. W.A.T.C.H. reports that from 1990 to 2011, there has been a 40% increase in the number of toy-related injuries.This yearโs report includes a wide range of toys, most of which are readily available at popular toy stores, such as Toys R Us and Kmart, or from on-line merchants, such as Amazon.com and Ebay.com.The list includes the โBud Skipitsโs Wheely Cute Pull Alongโ toy manufactured by Bunnies By The Bay, which is a furry stuffed animal that rests on four red wooden wheels with small blue hub caps that can be pulled around by children. The toy is recommended for babies six months or older. However, the group indicates that the pull along toy may pose a choking hazard for infants and young children, because certain lots of them were recalled earlier this year due to small pieces of the hub caps breaking off.Another pull-along toy making the list is the โPull Along Zebra,โ manufactured by Early Learning Centre, due to its potential risk for children to become entangled or strangle to death from the 21 inch pull cord. The industry regulates allowable lengths of cords on most childrenโs toys, which are not to exceed 12 inches. While longer cords are allowed for โpull toys,โ the consumer group warns that this can easily pose a strangulation hazard.The โKid Connection Doctor Play Setโ, sold by Walmart Inc., was added to the warning list due to potential ingestion and choking hazards from a multi-colored utensil, which children are encouraged to use in a manner similar to a doctor’s tongue depressor. If the specific piece were accidently ingested it could occlude airways and cause a choking hazard.Several other toys that made W.A.T.C.H.โs list for potential hazards to the eye, face, head, neck, or other bodily injuries, include the STATS 38 Quick Folding Trampoline manufactured by Toys R Us, Inc. which is recommended for children six years or older. However, health experts, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, have warned that trampolines of any size pose a serious risk of injury for children who could land on their head or neck causing broken bones, paralysis, or even death.Listed Fifth on the list is the โSplat X Smack Shot”, which is a form of sling shot that can shoot the included ammunition up to 100 feet, posing an increased risk of eye and facial injuries to anyone nearby the group claims.Another shooting-style toy on the list is the GD. Jiefeng Toys โFoam Dart Gun,โ which is marketed for children ages three and up, indicating that it not only pose eye injuries, but is dangerously realistic looking with perforated grips, cocking hammer, and designed slides all black in color, W.A.T.C.H. warns.The group says the next two toys on the list pose blunt force and head and impact injury hazards. The โKick Flipperโ toy manufactured by Playsmart Inc. is a rigid plastic board marketed to children as a skateboard without wheels to encourage tricks, but makes no mention of necessary or recommended safety gear for its use. The product packaging also fails to show children using the boards wearing helmets while performing tricks.Also posing blunt force injuries, according to W.A.T.C.H., is the โLeonardoโs Electronic Stealth Swordโ manufactured by Playmates International Company Ltd. The sword resembles the cartoon Ninja Turtle theme and encourages โNinja Battlesโ that may cause facial injuries from being hit with the hard plastic sword.The last toy on the list is the โVelociraptor Clawsโ toy, manufactured by Hasbro, which are slip-on-hand claws that resemble images and characters on the popular Jurassic World franchise that encourage children ages four and up to โclaw like a raptorโ. The packaging provides no warnings or cautions regarding potential eye and facial injuries that could occur.W.A.T.C.H. encourages parents and those buying for children to avoid the above mentioned toys this year and to use similar approaches when selecting other toys for children. The group also recommends that buying toys in-store rather than online can be beneficial when analyzing the dangers.Many online retailers are not required to disclose all of the warnings and may omit important safety information. The advantage of buying a toy in-person is being able to physically inspect the toy and read the manufacturerโs complete warning. The group says that in some cases parents may be aware of certain tendencies their children have and would be able to make a better more informed decision whether to buy it or not after inspecting the toy in person. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Child Injury, Childrens Toys, Trampoline Injury Image Credit: |Image via http://toysafety.org/More Lawsuit Stories Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims June 16, 2026 Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges June 16, 2026 EnfaCare Preterm Infant NEC Lawsuit Alleges Formula Caused Life-Threatening Diagnosis June 16, 2026 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026) Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (Posted: 2 days ago)A tentative Depo-Provera lawsuit settlement has been announced, vacating the start of the first bellwether trial while details are finalized.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026) Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: 6 days ago)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (Posted: 2 days ago)A tentative Depo-Provera lawsuit settlement has been announced, vacating the start of the first bellwether trial while details are finalized.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)
Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: 6 days ago)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)