RSS
TwitterFacebook

Xarelto Risks Lead FDA Panel To Recommend Against Expansion

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

An FDA advisory committee has recommended that the agency reject Johnson & Johnson’s efforts to expand the approved use of its blood thinner Xarelto for prevention of heart attacks.  

At a January 16 meeting, the FDA’s Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee voted unanimously that Johnson & Johnson and Bayer have failed to show that the benefits outweigh the potential Xarelto risks when used for the prevention of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Xarelto (rivaroxaban) is one of a new generation of anticoagulants used to reduce the risk of blood clots and strokes. Known as “direct thrombin inhibitors,” the new class of medications are marketed as a replacement for Coumadin, or warfarin, which has long been the standard anticoagulation therapy. The treatments have been promoted as superior to warfarin because they are easier to take and require less frequent monitoring to maintain the correct dose.

Potential side effects of Xarelto and other members of the same class of anticoagulants include a potential risk of uncontrollable bleeding, as the medications do not currently have an effective antidote to allow doctors to reverse the blood thinning effects of the drug when a hemorrhage begins.

The FDA has already turned down the drug makers’ requests to expand the use of Xarelto twice before. However, Johnson & Johnson and Bayer, distributing the drug jointly, continue to press for expanded use of the relatively new anticoagulant, based on the results of a clinical trial called Atlas. While the FDA is not required to follow the recommendations of its advisory committee, their findings often form the basis of the agency’s decisions.

The committee and the FDA have questioned the analysis of the Atlas trial data, indicating that they do not see the proof. They also question the fact that this time the manufacturers are pitching a 90-day regimen, when Atlas was designed to study chronic treatment, noting that the trial was never designed to look at effectiveness over such a short period of time. The trial’s shortcomings were highlighted in an FDA reviewer report (PDF) provided to the advisory committee before the meeting.

The reviewers also question the fact that data on 400 patients that participated in the study is missing. Previously, data on nearly 1,300 patients was missing. Given concerns over Xarelto bleeding events, some reviewers question why that data has not been found and presented.

New Blood Thinner Bleeding Risks

Xarelto was first introduced in July 2011, as the second drug in this new class of “direct thrombin inhibitors.” It is currently approved for prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among individuals undergoing knee or hip replacement surgery, to reduce the risk of stroke among people suffering from atrial fibrillation and to reduce the risk of DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE).

Pradaxa (dabigatran) was the first drug in this class to hit the market, introduced by Boehringer Ingelheim in October 2010. While Pradaxa did gain an advantage by being first to market, concerns have surrounded the medication, as it quickly became one of the most common prescription medications associated with adverse event reports submitted to the FDA, often involving problems with uncontrollable bleeding on Pradaxa.

While all blood thinners carry a risk of bleeding, Xarelto, Pradaxa and other direct thrombin inhibitors currently lack an effective reversal agent. While doctors are able to administer a dose of vitamin K and plasma to reverse any bleeding problems that develop with warfarin, no such antidote is available for the new class of medication, making it harder to prevent serious injury or death if patients suffer bleeding problems. Some doctors have found success using off-label treatments to halt Xarelto bleeding events, but no formal treatment has been approved or recognized.

Boehringer Ingelheim currently faces hundreds of Pradaxa injury lawsuits that have been filed on behalf of former users of the medication who experienced severe bleeds. The complaints allege that the drug maker failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the medication, including the lack of an available reversal agent to stop bleeding problems that may develop.

Bayer and Johnson & Johnson are working with a company called Portola Pharmaceuticals to try and develop a Xarelto reversal agent and are testing one possible antidote. Boehringer Ingelheim is also reportedly looking at a possible reversal agent for Pradaxa. It is widely believed that if either of these “direct thrombin inhibitors” are shown to have an effective antidote for bleeding events, sales will increase dramatically.

Tags: , , , , ,

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.