Chesapeake Regional Lawsuits Filed by Nearly 1,000 Women Who May Have Undergone Unnecessary Surgeries
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Zen Magnets Recall Targeted by CPSC Administrative Complaint August 8, 2012 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Federal regulators are trying to get Zen Magnets recalled from shelves, warning that the rare earth magnets may pose a risk of serious injury or death if they are swallowed by children.ย On August 6, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) filed an administrative complaint (PDF) to force a Zen Magnets Rare Earth Magnet Balls recall. The commission voted 3 to 1 to file the complaint, which would stop the manufacturer from selling the magnets and require that they notify the public that the toys are defective and offer a full refund. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION This is the latest in a series of moves against magnetic toy manufacturers, who sell small and powerful magnets that are designed as a desk toy for adults. However, in many cases the magnets have been accidentally swallowed by infants or children who put the small objects in their mouth, which can cause severe internal damage and potentially result in death. “If two or more of the magnets are ingested and their magnetic forces pull them together, the magnets can pinch or trap the intestinal walls or other digestive tissue between them resulting in acute and long-term health consequences,” the CPSC complaint explains. “Magnets that attract through the walls of the intestines result in progressive tissue injury, beginning with local inflammation and ulceration, progressing to tissue death, then perforation or fistula formation. Such conditions can lead to infection, sepsis, and death.” According to the CPSC, 11 manufacturers of similar magnets have volunteered to issue recalls and stop selling their items in the United States, but the makers of Zen Magnets have refused. A similar complaint was filed by CPSC to force a Buckyball and Buckycube magnet recall last month, after the manufacturer of that product, Maxfield & Oberton, also failed to cooperate with the federal regulators. The Zen Magnets lawsuit is only the third such complaint filed by the CPSC in 11 years. The toys were supposed to be marketed to consumers age 14 and older, but the CPSC reports that the Zen Magnets included a slip of paper with unusual age instructions, which violate federal regulations, stating: “Warning: DO NOT SWALLOW MAGNETS. How old do you have to be to play with these? Dunno. 14 years old in the U.S. for a strong magnetic toy, unless it’s not a toy, then no age limit, but they’re fun magnets spheres (sic), aren’t they a toy? Unless it’s a “science kit” then the government age recommendation is 8+. But really, it’s whatever age at which a person stops swallowing non-foods.” In a report published by the American Academy of Pediatrics in June 2012, the risk of serious injuries from magnet toys was highlighted, explaining that the magnets may attract to one another across the intestinal wall, causing severe internal damage, such as obstructions and perforations.ย It is often necessary to remove the magnets surgically, which can result in further damage to the childโs stomach or intestines. Last month, U.S. Toymaker Battat Incorporated, maker of the Magnabild Magnetic Building Sets, was fined $400,000 for allegedly failing to report problems with their magnetic toys, which were blamed for the death of at least one child. In May two personal injury lawsuits were filed against MEGA Brands of America after children suffered severe intestinal injuries from swallowing magnets from the Magnetix brand toy line. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Childrens Toy, Magnets Image Credit: | More Lawsuit Stories Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks March 10, 2026 Uber Sexual Assault MDL Judge Considered Expanding Jury Pool in Next Bellwether Trial March 10, 2026 Chesapeake Regional Lawsuits Filed by Nearly 1,000 Women Who May Have Undergone Unnecessary Surgeries March 10, 2026 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: today) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026) Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (Posted: yesterday) A Georgia couple’s lawsuit claims the makers of Dupixent failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of mycosis fungoides, a type of T-cell lymphoma. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026)MDL Sought for Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (02/19/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent for Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema Treatment Caused CTCL (02/10/2026) Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Blood Clot Results in Lawsuit Against Device Manufacturer (02/04/2026)SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges AngioDynamics Catheter Defects Forced Surgical Removal (01/30/2026)Severe Sepsis Infection Leads to Vortex Port Catheter Wrongful Death Lawsuit (01/12/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks March 10, 2026
Chesapeake Regional Lawsuits Filed by Nearly 1,000 Women Who May Have Undergone Unnecessary Surgeries March 10, 2026
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: today) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)
Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (Posted: yesterday) A Georgia couple’s lawsuit claims the makers of Dupixent failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of mycosis fungoides, a type of T-cell lymphoma. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026)MDL Sought for Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (02/19/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent for Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema Treatment Caused CTCL (02/10/2026)
Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Blood Clot Results in Lawsuit Against Device Manufacturer (02/04/2026)SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges AngioDynamics Catheter Defects Forced Surgical Removal (01/30/2026)Severe Sepsis Infection Leads to Vortex Port Catheter Wrongful Death Lawsuit (01/12/2026)