Petition to Ban Triclosan Claims Antibacterial Agent is a Threat to Health

|||

A group of environmentally-conscious public employees is calling for a ban on triclosan; a commonly used antibacterial chemical, which they say does little to prevent illness and is a threat to human health and the environment. 

The petition to ban triclosan was put forward to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) earlier this month by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

The organization says that triclosan is aiding in the development and spread of antibiotic-resistant illnesses, like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria (MRSA). They also say that triclosan is also being found to accumulate in higher and higher levels in wildlife.

Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits
Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits

Triclosan is an antifungal and antibacterial chemical added to many U.S. cleaning products; from toothpaste to hand soap to acne medication. However, the FDA has stated that there is no evidence it provides any health benefit to consumers.

Many experts, including the American Medical Association, are concerned that the widespread and haphazard use of the antibacterial agent helps bacteria build resistances to modern drugs, which makes them harder to treat. According to PEER, more than 90,000 people die each year due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

“In our quest to protect ourselves from germs, Americans are exposing themselves to far greater biological dangers,” New England PEER Director Kyla Bennett, a former EPA scientist, said in a press release. “Given that there are equally effective, less dangerous alternatives, there is no reason to subject people and the environment to these hazards.”

About a year ago, in April 2010, the FDA published a web page titled “Triclosan: What Consumers Should Know.” On the webpage, the FDA says that while there are no known human health risks connected to triclosan, there have been a number of scientific studies that have raised concerns since the agency last reviewed the antibacterial chemical.

The FDA says that studies have shown that triclosan can alter hormone regulation in some animals. Other studies have supported the belief that it contributes to the evolution of bacteria that is antibiotic resistant.

“At this time, the agency does not have evidence that triclosan in antibacterial soaps and body washes provides any benefit over washing with regular soap and water,” the agency concluded.

The FDA is in the process of reviewing triclosan’s hormonal effects in light of the animal studies and expects to release its findings sometime this spring.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Wisconsin woman has filed a Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuit, alleging that she continued using the birth control injection for years after her diagnosis due to the manufacturers’ failure to provide adequate warnings about the potential risk of developing a meningioma.
Following the rapid expansion of legalized sports betting across the U.S., a new watchdog report reveals how the gambling industry lobbied against consumer protections to prevent sports betting addictions, while wagers reached $148 billion annually.
A group of 11 lawsuits over complications associated with Bard PowerPort and other implantable port catheters will be prepared for a series of early bellwether trials in the federal MDL.