Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Abbott Recalls Trifecta Heart Valves From U.S. Market Amid Concerns About Early Deterioration Problems Withdrawal comes after FDA warning that problems with Trifecta heart valves have been linked to nearly 200 patient deaths due to early deterioration August 1, 2023 Russell Maas Add Your Comments Following an FDA warning issued earlier this year about early deterioration problems with Trifecta heart valves, which have been linked to nearly 200 patient deaths since 2011, Abbott Laboratories has announced that it is removing the controversial valves from the market and recalling any remaining devices that medical providers still have in inventory. In a letter (PDF) sent to customers on July 31, Abbott announced that it is discontinuing the Trifecta family of values, including the Abbott Trifecta Valve and the Trifecta Valve with Glide Technology (Trifecta GT). The manufacturer also indicated that it will collect unused devices from the field. The recall comes nearly six months after the FDA first posted information about potential Abbott Trifecta Valve deterioration risks, urging individuals with the device to seek immediate medical attention if they experience shortness of breath, fatigue or other new symptoms. In addition, doctors were asked to ensure life-long follow up visits are conducted, at least once per year, to monitor for signs of early structural valve deterioration (SVD). Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Trifecta Heart Valve Premature Deterioration Problems The first generation model of the Trifecta valve was approved by the FDA in 2011, and the Trifecta GT valve was introduced in 2016. The valves are a type of prosthetic designed to treat individuals with diseased, damaged, or malfunctioning aortic heart valves, which play a crucial in the circulatory system, controlling the flow of oxygen-rich blood from the heart to the rest of the body. In certain conditions, such as aortic stenosis (a narrowing of the aortic valve opening) or aortic regurgitation (a condition where the aortic valve doesn’t close tightly), the aortic valve does not function properly. For these individuals, doctors may recommend removing the patient’s original aortic valve and replacing it with a prosthetic. Although the Trifecta valves were marketed as safe and effective, the devices have been associated with nearly 3,000 adverse events since 2011, including over 2,100 reported injuries and, 191 deaths. These problems led the FDA to issue warnings to healthcare providers in February 2023, citing recent data that suggested the Trifecta valves are at risk of deteriorating within five years, with most problems appearing between three and four years after being implanted. SVD is a known problem which can affect artificial heart valves, causing the aortic valve to narrow leak, or both, often leading to the need for further surgery. However, the FDA warned that the Trifecta valve deterioration rate, and the need for surgical intervention, was much higher than other heart valves on the market. Abbott Trifecta Valve Recall Could Have Come Earlier In the letter sent to customers this week, Abbott indicates that it decided to discontinue the Trifecta valves to focus on tissue heart valve solutions that maximize the possibility for lifetime management of valvular heart disease. However, the manufacturer may now faces serious questions about why it failed to issue a Trifecta valve recall earlier, or adequately disclose information about the early deterioration as soon as it was discovered. The same day Abbott asked customers to remove unused devices, the FDA posted an update on it’s website, indicating that the agency’s recommendations for individuals implanted with a Trifecta valve has not changed. However, the FDA noted that it will continue to work with Abbott to evaluate the risk of early structural valve deterioration with devices already implanted, and keep the public informed if there are any new recommendations or regulatory actions. The affected Trifecta valves and model numbers include; TrifectaTM Valve and TrifectaTM Valve with Glide Technology Model: TF-19A, TF-21A, TF-23A, TF-25A, TF-27A, TF-29A, TFGT-19A, TFGT-21A, TFGT-23A, TFGT-25A, TFGT-27A, and TFGT-29A. In the coming weeks, the FDA may decide to classify the voluntary market withdrawal as an Abbott Trifecta Heart Valve recall, to make sure the public and healthcare providers understand the potential risks that may result from continued use of the devices. Given the widespread problems linked to the device in recent years, it is also possible the manufacturer will face substantial liability from Abbott Trifecta Heart Valve lawsuits brought on behalf of individuals who experienced complications following early deterioration of the valve. Tags: Abbott Laboratories, Aortic Stenosis, Heart Valves, Trifecta Heart Valve, Trifecta Heart Valve Recall More Lawsuit Stories Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker March 26, 2025 Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 March 26, 2025 Lithium-Ion Battery Explosions Could Be Prevented by New Kind of Sensor March 26, 2025 7 Comments Rick January 5, 2024 I had one of these Trifecta GT valves put in me in July of 2020. I never felt well after that surgery and I told my cardiologist over and over again about this. Two weeks ago this defective valve in me tore, causing serious chest pains. I went to the ER and to make a long story short, they put a new, different valve in me. I believe that the hospital, surgeon, or cardiologist had to know about this faulty valve they put in me. I was never, ever contacted about this though. I was one of the lucky ones who didn’t die from this, but I did have to spend 11 awful days in the hospital before and after getting the new valve last week. I am now recovering from a very, very unpleasant situation. Robert February 22, 2024 On February 25, 2019 I had my Aortic valve replaced due to Aortic Stenosis, They used The Trifecta valve. November 29, 2023 I had to have a TAVR procedure due to severe Aortic Stenosis. The first valve didn’t even last 5 years. Rick February 27, 2024 I had one of these Trifecta GT Tissue Heart Valves put into me in July of 2000. It’s a long story but new negative symptoms (shortness of breath, fatigue, weakness, headaches) arose after this replacement that altered my life since. Last week I started getting chest pains, went to the ER, and they found that my Trifecta valve had torn. This was only after 3-1/2 years of use. They did another heart surgery to replace this Trifecta product with a new Pericardial device. I am now much better but have lost 3-1/2 years of my life – not being able to do things (travel, golf, running) I normally would do. I want some sort of compensation from Abbott Labs for the suffering I have gone through over these past few years. By the way, I don’t know why, but I have lost over 60 pounds since that 2000 replacement. I am nothing but skin and bones now. Mitchell March 14, 2024 I had a tf-21a implanted in me in 2015. only by accident in November 23 i was in the hospital for a kidney stone. that day they told me My valve was severely leaking. At that point i went to my cardiologist and he confirmed. i had a second echo and it confirmed . I then went to cornell university hospital and saw a great surgeon and he said it should be replaced. I then went home that night and looked up my valve and it was a tf-21a. At that point I made the schedule to replace it march 25 2024. Thereafter i called a few law firm about the lawsuit i had been reading about. and after providing them a ton of material from my hospital letter from abbott labs. they call me back to tell me they did not want my case. They did not want it cause i did not show and damages yet! although I did have a stroke, tired, etc. I said why wait people are dying from this valve. don’t they read article on the thousands that are effected and 191 died from failure. I want it out of me!!!!! And the Hospital Valley hospital in ridgewood NJ did not sent out a warning after one years. I called them and they don’t want to take responsibility for doing that they blame abbott lab to. Well Valley hospital abbott sent letter to you. i can imagine i was lucky to find out by being in the hospital in November sorry for all the other that don’t know. This is a failure of responsibility on the hospital part to inform there customer and the women said to me in public relation said ” What do you want us to do Mr Cooperman” i said how about a apology first of all. And she hung up. i can go on about this failure of the FDA, Abbott and Valley hospital, i think the failure is to on these attorney who only want perfect cases so they can win. Let me ask you Mr attorney, If mercedes sent you a letter saying ” we have a possibility of brake failure in your car that you bought on the backs of personnel injury would you drive the car until you got into accident and god forbid someone died or have it fixed right away” Well that is what I doing!!!! Is anyone else going through this. Mitch John September 9, 2024 I was born with a bicuspid aortic valve and went to the Cleveland clinic and they had just switched over to the new St Jude trifecta from the Edward sabian it was 2013 I had to have that valve put in me and was tired ever since I had to stop working driving a truck because I was always too tired I had shoulder replacement 2022 and found out through an echo cardiogram that my valve was stiffening. The valve is a TF 27a. I found out I need to have it replaced that I was never notified that the valve was recalled in October of 2023. They have known about this problem for years in the meantime I have been suffering from fatigue and unable to do much of anything but sleep Margaret January 9, 2025 My husband had one put on a died three days after. Dwight January 13, 2025 I had a TFGT-23A valve implanted in Nov 2022 due to a heart murmur from birth . After recovery I have returned to normal activity although I do catch more naps than I use to. I went in for my annual cardio check and ask my doctor about the Abbott valve removal from the market issue. He referred me to the surgeon who did the surgery for additional information. After further talking he then recommended an echo cardiogram if I was so concerned and would follow up every year with the same. I am schedule this week to have the EC test. No response from surgeons office on my request for information/recommendations. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (Posted: today) A U.S. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITGroup of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025) Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 (Posted: today) Parties have until April 28 to turn in a list of six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that should be prepared for bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITSmiths Medical Port Catheter Recall Issued Over Manufacturing Error (03/20/2025)E. Coli Infection Was Caused by AngioDynamics SmartPort Port Catheter, Lawsuit Alleges (03/03/2025)Schedule To Prepare Bard PowerPort Lawsuits for Bellwether Trials To Be Proposed by Parties (02/27/2025) Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)
Court Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (Posted: today) A U.S. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITGroup of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)BioZorb Attorneys Propose Leadership Structure for Lawsuits Over Recalled Tissue Marker (03/05/2025)
Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial Selections To Be Made in Late April 2025 (Posted: today) Parties have until April 28 to turn in a list of six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that should be prepared for bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITSmiths Medical Port Catheter Recall Issued Over Manufacturing Error (03/20/2025)E. Coli Infection Was Caused by AngioDynamics SmartPort Port Catheter, Lawsuit Alleges (03/03/2025)Schedule To Prepare Bard PowerPort Lawsuits for Bellwether Trials To Be Proposed by Parties (02/27/2025)
Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)