Adverse Drug Event Complaints Jumped 90% in 4 Years: Report

According to a quarterly report issued on adverse drug events submitted to federal health officials, the number of complaints associated with prescription medications has jumped 90% over the last four years. 

The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) released their QuarterWatch (PDF) report earlier this month, analyzing adverse drug events reported to the FDA during the first quarter of this year. The number of problems reported during the first quarter of this year was 23.8% higher than the last quarter of 2011, and 30.1% higher than the first quarter of 2011.

Overall, the FDA received 57,393 reports involving harmful drug side effects and complications during the first quarter of 2012. ISMP calculates that there are now an additional 27,290 side effect reports submitted to the FDA each quarter when compared to 2008 and prior years.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The report suggests several factors that may be responsible for the increase, with the largest increase coming from a 40% increase in reports for drugs seen in all four years. Special circumstances involving the side effects of a few high-profile drugs, like Chantix and Pradaxa, accounted for 37% of the increase, and reports for new drugs not widely used in 2008 account for about 23% of the increased number of reports, according to ISMP.

The report also criticized the FDA for giving waivers to drug manufacturers, which allows them to avoid making reports about adverse events that they do not consider serious. This has made data from the adverse event reporting system irregular, ISMP argues.

“The FDA waiver policy has three drawbacks. Granting waivers rather than establishing a uniform standard means comparisons between drugs can be misleading because thousands of non-serious reports might not have been submitted for one drug because of a waiver,” the report concludes. “Also, many non-serious events – such as palpitations or nausea – can be harbingers of far more serious ones. Finally, companies differ in how they apply the definition of ‘not serious.’”

In this quarter, ISMP looked at signs of withdrawal problems linked to the antidepressant Cymbalta, Actos bladder cancer problems, hypersensitivity reactions linked to the blood pressure drug Tekturna, and reports of blood clots linked to the new blood thinner Xarelto.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Breast mesh implants promoted as internal bras are now under scrutiny, following studies and FDA warnings linking the devices to infections, implant loss, and surgical failure. Lawsuits are being investigated for women who suffered complications after reconstruction or augmentation procedures involving products like GalaFLEX, Phasix, Strattice, and AlloDerm.
Dupixent users are coming forward with accounts of devastating cancer diagnoses, saying the popular eczema drug masked early warning signs of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. As the FDA investigates and the first lawsuit is filed, researchers warn Dupixent may unmask or accelerate hidden cancers, raising urgent questions about its long-term safety.
Plaintiffs involved in GLP-1 vision loss lawsuits are calling for the litigation to be consolidated in New Jersey federal court, and not be bundled with existing stomach paralysis litigation.