Aldi Pressure Cooker Defects Led to Burn Injuries, Lawsuit Alleges

Although highly touted safety features were intended to eliminate the risk of pressure cooker explosion injuries, a Texas woman indicates that she suffered severe burns when the lid on an Aldi pressure cooker was removed and scalding hot contents were forcefully ejected.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Waleksa Cardoso Schell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on December 14, indicating that her Ambiano 6 in 1 Programmable Pressure Cooker was defective and failed to prevent the lid from being removed while the contents were under pressure, even though advertised safety features were meant to prevent this from being possible.

The lawsuit, which names Aldi, Inc. as the sole defendant, warns that the pressure cooker has a lid that is still able to be removed while heat and steam are built up inside the device.

“When the lid is removed under such circumstances, the pressure trapped within the unit causes scalding hot contents to be projected from the unit and into the surrounding area, including onto the unsuspecting consumers, their families and bystanders,” according to the complaint. “The Plaintiff in this case was able to remove the lid while the pressure cooker retained pressure, causing her serious and substantial bodily injuries and damages.”

Pressure Cooker Lawsuits Over Safety Feature Failures

The case joins dozens of similarย pressure cooker lawsuitsย filed in recent months, each raising allegations about unreasonably dangerous designs and defective safety features on several modern devices, including Instant Pot, Crock-Pot, Ninja Foodi and other brands.

Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer

Most of the accidents involve severeย pressure cooker burn injuriesย that occurred after the lid was removed while the contents are still under high pressure, typically resulting in burns covering a large percentage of the userโ€™s body. However, other injuries linked to pressure cookers have included eye injuries, broken bones and other complications that resulted from electrocutions, spills or explosions.

As more of these electric pressure cookers have been introduced in recent years, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued several pressure cooker recalls over problems where lids were able to be opened while contents are under pressure, allowing hot contents to be expelled and causing a scald or burn injury to individuals in the immediate area.

Most recently, a massiveย Crock-Pot recallย was issued in November 2020, impacting nearly 1 million 6-Quart Express Crock Multi-Cookers with lid locking defects, after at least 99 burn injuries were reported.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโ€™s chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.
A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.