Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Blue-Light Blocking Glasses Do Not Provide Benefits Reducing Eyestrain or Improving Sleep: StudyDespite marketing claims that promote blue-light filtering glasses, new research suggests that they do not provide any real benefit when using digital devices, which only generate a small amount of blue light anyway August 28, 2023 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsUsing blue-light blocking glasses to prevent eye strain and improve sleep may not offer any significant benefits, even though consumers often pay a premium for the option, according to the findings of a new study.The findings, published on August 18 in the journal Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, come despite blue light blockers being touted for years as the secret to sleeping better and reducing eye strain after hours on the computer.Blue light-blocking glasses filter ultraviolet radiation and varying portions of short-wavelength visible light from reaching the eye. Blue light has a shorter visible wavelength than other light, such as red or green. The shorter the wavelength, the more energy the light is considered to have.In the mid-2000s, blue-light blockers became increasingly popular, but interest surged after the onset of the pandemic, as people around the world reported major disruptions to sleep patterns.Manufacturers and proponents claim the glasses improve sleep quality by blocking the harmful blue light in the late evening before bed as well as providing protection to the retina from digital screens.This latest study was conducted by a team of British researchers who reviewed 17 randomized control trials, including a range of group sizes from five participants to 156 people, who were followed from one to five weeks.Few Sleep Benefits from Blue Blocking LensesSix of those studies focused on sleep and the use of blue-blocking lenses. Three of those studies showed some improvement to sleep for those who used blue blockers, while the others showed no benefit.Nearly all studies on blue-light blocking glasses and sleep were conducted among specific populations already struggling with sleep, including pregnant women and people with certain mental conditions.The three studies that showed some benefits of sleep indicated participants reported significant improvement in sleep scores when using blue light glasses.However, because the studies were conducted among a limited population, there is no evidence the benefits apply more broadly, since studies on blue-light glasses have yet to be conducted among the general population.Blue Blockers Do Very Little for Eye StrainThree studies showed blue blockers made only a slight difference in eyestrain. However, all the studies were conducted over a short period of time and didnโt provide significant evidence that the glasses had a great effect on improving or relieving eyestrain from screens.Data indicates blue-light glasses only block about 10-25% of blue light from digital screens.However, researchers say there isnโt much blue light coming from phones, TVs, and computers anyway. Those devices emit roughly 0.4% to 4% of the amount of blue light considered safe by the International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Group, which sets international limits on blue light.Science Behind Blue Light Blocking Glasses is WeakThe ideas about blue-light glasses largely stem from research on the bodyโs response to the sunโs light and the bodyโs circadian rhythm. The sunset signals the brain to prepare for sleep.The theory is blue light from digital screens disrupts that signal and interferes with sleep. However, most studies on blue light and the circadian rhythm were done on animals, not humans.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONBlue-light blocking lenses are sold for roughly $25 to $100 for designer versions. They are often marketed as โmust-haveโ items for healthy eyes, preventing eye strain, avoiding disruption to natural sleep patterns, and preventing harmful UV light from screens.Researchers speculate the reason many people suffer from eyestrain when using digital devices is how they use them. People tend to hold devices 12 inches away from the face. Instead, people should try to hold screens 18 inches away and take frequent breaks to prevent strain.Study authors also recommend people who suffer from disrupted sleep should adopt better sleep habits. They should avoid scrolling on cell phones 1-2 hours before bed, go to sleep around the same time every night and avoid caffeine 10 hours before bedtime.While the study findings didnโt find using blue-light-blocking glasses provided a benefit to users, there is little harm in using them, researchers concluded. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Eye Strain, False Advertising, Glasses, Sleep Deprivation, UltravioletMore Lawsuit Stories Recalled Omnipod 5 Injuries Skyrocket, Prompting Removal of Insulin Pump Pods April 30, 2026 Weber Grill Brush Lawsuit Claims Detached Bristle Punctured Manโs Intestine April 30, 2026 AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism April 30, 2026 0 Comments NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Recalled Omnipod 5 Injuries Skyrocket, Prompting Removal of Insulin Pump Pods (Posted: today)Insulet is removing certain Omnipod 5 insulin pump pods from use following a surge in reports of insulin delivery failures that raise risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and other serious complications.MORE ABOUT: OMNIPOD RECALL LAWSUITInsulet OmniPod 5 Recall Lawsuits May Be Filed Over Problems Resulting in Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Hospitalization and Death (03/24/2026)Omnipod 5 Insulin Pump Recall Follows Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (03/20/2026) Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (Posted: yesterday)A Florida womanโs lawsuit alleges that Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific altered their SCS device batteries, firmware and stimulation features without adequate safety testing approved by the FDA.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITJPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (04/24/2026)SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (04/20/2026)WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026) Lawsuit Blames Depo Shot for Brain Tumors, Intense Headaches (Posted: 2 days ago)A Depo-Provera lawsuit filed against Pfizer says the manufacturer knew Depo-Provera could stimulate brain tumor growth before the birth control shots hit the market, yet failed to warn doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (04/22/2026)Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)
AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism April 30, 2026
Recalled Omnipod 5 Injuries Skyrocket, Prompting Removal of Insulin Pump Pods (Posted: today)Insulet is removing certain Omnipod 5 insulin pump pods from use following a surge in reports of insulin delivery failures that raise risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and other serious complications.MORE ABOUT: OMNIPOD RECALL LAWSUITInsulet OmniPod 5 Recall Lawsuits May Be Filed Over Problems Resulting in Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Hospitalization and Death (03/24/2026)Omnipod 5 Insulin Pump Recall Follows Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (03/20/2026)
Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (Posted: yesterday)A Florida womanโs lawsuit alleges that Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific altered their SCS device batteries, firmware and stimulation features without adequate safety testing approved by the FDA.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITJPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (04/24/2026)SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (04/20/2026)WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)
Lawsuit Blames Depo Shot for Brain Tumors, Intense Headaches (Posted: 2 days ago)A Depo-Provera lawsuit filed against Pfizer says the manufacturer knew Depo-Provera could stimulate brain tumor growth before the birth control shots hit the market, yet failed to warn doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (04/22/2026)Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)