Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Cartiva Recall Lawsuit Alleges Failed Toe Implant Had To Be Surgically Removed Days Before Manufacturer Acknowledged Defect Although there were high failure rates with Cartiva toe implants, lawsuit alleges the manufacturer waited years to recall the devices. December 6, 2024 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments According to allegations raised in a recently filed product liability lawsuit, a West Virginia woman had to have a failed Cartiva implant surgically removed just three weeks before the manufacturer finally decided to pull all of the devices from the market. The complaint (PDF) was brought by Tammy May in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia on November 27, indicating that the named defendants, including Cartiva Inc., Wright Medical Group N.V. and Stryker B.V., knew or should have known about the high risk of shrinkage with their Cartiva implant, yet continued to market the product as a safe and effective treatment for degenerative arthritis in the big toe. The Cartiva SCI was introduced in 2016, as a breakthrough alternative to big toe fusion surgery for individuals experiencing hallux limitus or hallux rigidus. However, post-marketing reports have indicated that the Cartiva failure rates are substantially higher than the manufacturers initially reported. Although a number of Cartiva lawsuits have been filed by individuals like May over the past few years, and a number of published case reports have highlighted devastating complications patients were experienced, the manufacturers did not issue a Cartiva implant recall until October 31, 2024. Cartiva Lawsuit Did you or a loved one receive a Cartiva Toe Implant? Lawyers are reviewing Cartiva lawsuits for individuals who experienced complications after receiving the toe implant. Settlement benefits may be available. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Cartiva Lawsuit Did you or a loved one receive a Cartiva Toe Implant? Lawyers are reviewing Cartiva lawsuits for individuals who experienced complications after receiving the toe implant. Settlement benefits may be available. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Stryker quietly removed Cartiva from the market and called for medical providers to return all existing devices, after acknowledging that patients were experiencing “higher-than-expected” failure rates compared to data the manufacturers used to obtain approval for the device in 2016. These complications have included the need for revision or removal of the implant, subsidence, displacement, persistent pain, nerve damage and fragmentation. In her Cartiva recall lawsuit, May indicates she suffered many of these injuries herself, after having the device implanted in April 2022, following a hallux rigidis diagnosis. “Contrary to all representations by Defendants, the SCI has not been effective at alleviating pain or restoring range of motion,” May’s lawsuit states. “In fact, Plaintiff has suffered permanent restrictions in the use of (her) big toe; forced adaptations to account for this restriction in neighboring joints; increased wear and tear on other components of the foot and leg; and, limitations on footwear options and active recreational activities.” Just three weeks before the Cartiva recall was announced, May had the implant surgically removed on October 9. However, she indicates that the manufacturers left the device on the market for years after learning about its high rate of failures. “Prior to the implantation of Plaintiff’s SCI, Defendants were aware of higher than reported loss of toe mobility, pain and high failure rates of the SCI due to shrinkage, including but not limited to 144 adverse event reports in the Maude database with the majority of events attributed to implant loosening,” the lawsuit states. “The loosening is likely due to shrinkage of the implant that is well supported by peer-reviewed literature mentioned herein.” The lawsuit alleges that the manufacturers knew about the problems before May received the implant in 2022, but sat on that information for as long as they could to increase profits, even taking over sales and distribution when doctors began to shy away from the implant due to its reported problems. May’s complaint presents claims of strict products liability, negligent design, manufacture and/or distribution, misbranded and adulterated device, common law product liability and negligence, breach of warranty, and seeks both compensatory and punitive damages. Cartiva Recall Lawyers Following the decision to remove their product from the market, a growing number of individuals are now reaching out to lawyers to determine whether they may be eligible for financial compensation through a Cartiva recall lawsuit, claiming that they may have avoided injuries or the need for additional surgery if manufacturers had accurately disclosed the implant’s failure rates. Claims are being investigated for individuals who received the big toe implant and experienced any of the following complications: Implant Failure/Fracture Subsidence (implant sinks into the bone) Toe Fusion Surgery Replacement Surgery Revision Surgery Cartiva recall lawyers provide free consultations and claim evaluations, with all claims are being pursued on a contingency fee basis, which means that there are no fees or expenses paid unless a Cartiva settlement or lawsuit payout is received. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Arthritis, Big Toe, Cartiva, Cartiva Recall, Stryker Find Out If You Qualify for Cartiva Failure Compensation More Cartiva Lawsuit Stories Lawsuit Claims Cartiva Implant Caused Bone Loss and Nerve Damage in Big Toe August 12, 2025 Judge Orders Cartiva Implant Settlement Talks Before Trial in Aug. 2026 July 28, 2025 Cartiva Settlement Rumors Mount Again, as More Toe Implant Lawsuits Withdrawn and Trials Approach June 26, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermInstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (Posted: 2 days ago) In March 2026, a jury is scheduled to hear a Wayfair fire pit lawsuit from a woman who suffered burns to nearly half her body. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITAmazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025)Colsen Fire Pit Lawsuit Involving Severe Burn Injuries Suffered by a Child Set for Trial Next Year (08/14/2025) Dupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (Posted: 3 days ago) Dupixent lawsuits are now being investigated after studies and FDA reports link Dupixent (dupilumab) to cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects May Increase Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Risks (08/26/2025) Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (Posted: 4 days ago) A new study appears to further confirm and quantify the risks of Depo-Provera meningioma side effects, potentially providing further evidence for growing litigation. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITPfizer Seeks Dismissal of Depo-Provera Failure-To-Warn Lawsuits Over Meningioma Risks (09/02/2025)Nearly 1,000 Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawsuits Filed, With Another 9,500 Under Investigation (08/25/2025)Experts Weigh In On Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Risks, As Lawsuits Continue to Mount (08/20/2025)
Cartiva Settlement Rumors Mount Again, as More Toe Implant Lawsuits Withdrawn and Trials Approach June 26, 2025
Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (Posted: 2 days ago) In March 2026, a jury is scheduled to hear a Wayfair fire pit lawsuit from a woman who suffered burns to nearly half her body. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITAmazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025)Colsen Fire Pit Lawsuit Involving Severe Burn Injuries Suffered by a Child Set for Trial Next Year (08/14/2025)
Dupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (Posted: 3 days ago) Dupixent lawsuits are now being investigated after studies and FDA reports link Dupixent (dupilumab) to cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects May Increase Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Risks (08/26/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (Posted: 4 days ago) A new study appears to further confirm and quantify the risks of Depo-Provera meningioma side effects, potentially providing further evidence for growing litigation. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITPfizer Seeks Dismissal of Depo-Provera Failure-To-Warn Lawsuits Over Meningioma Risks (09/02/2025)Nearly 1,000 Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawsuits Filed, With Another 9,500 Under Investigation (08/25/2025)Experts Weigh In On Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Risks, As Lawsuits Continue to Mount (08/20/2025)