Consumer’s Popcorn Lung Lawsuit Proceeding to Trial

|

The trial of a popcorn lung lawsuit began in Colorado this week, involving a claim brought by a consumer who alleges that he developed the respiratory condition after eating bags of microwave popcorn every night for ten years. 

The complaint was filed in 2007 by Wayne Watson, who was one of the first non-factory workers to bring a case over bronchiolitis obliterans, which has become more commonly known as “popcorn lung” because it may be caused by exposure to a chemical known as diacetyl, which was previously used to give microwave popcorn its buttery smell.

Most lawsuits filed over popcorn lung disease have been brought by microwave popcorn factory workers or those who working in plants where flavoring chemicals were produced.

THC-Vape-Pen-Lawsuit

Watson filed the lawsuit against King Soopers, alleging that the grocery store chain knew or should have known that selling microwave popcorn that used diacetyl could negatively affect the health of consumers. Popcorn factory workers had already won large verdicts against manufacturers over the problem in 2004-2005.

Diacetyl was used for years to give microwave popcorn its buttery smell before it was linked to popcorn lung. The microwave popcorn industry turned away from the additive once its links to popcorn lung disease became widely recognized and have used a variety of substitutes to duplicate its effects. However, diacetyl is still used as a food additive in some other industries.

Popcorn lung causes scarring and inflammation of small airways, known as bronchioles, leading to diminished lung capacity and breathing problems. The disease is irreversible and severe cases may require lung transplants and can lead to death.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Parties involved in a Dupixent T-cell lymphoma wrongful death lawsuit will participate in an initial status conference in early December, to map out how the litigation will move forward.
A group of plaintiffs are asking a panel of federal judges to consolidate all Lyft lawsuits involving driver sexual assaults against passengers before one judge as part of a Lyft MDL.
Federal regulators warned years ago that mesh implants were never approved for use in breast surgery, yet manufacturers continued marketing them as internal bra devices for reconstruction and cosmetic augmentation.