JPML To Hear Oral Arguments Over Consolidation Of Covid-19 Insurance Coverage Lawsuits Via Zoom Meeting This Week

A panel of federal judges will hear oral arguments this week during a video-conference hearing, to determine whether all COVID-19 insurance coverage lawsuits filed by small businesses nationwide should be consolidated before one U.S. District Judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

The same pandemic at the heart of the lawsuits has led to the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) announcing in a supplemental notice (PDF) that this hearing session will be held through the Zoom video meeting app on Thursday, July 30.

The panel is considering whether to consolidate at least 16 individual and class action lawsuits filed against insurance carriers in recent months, each raising similar allegations that business interruption insurance claims have been routinely denied, regardless of the policy language or cause of the business losses during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

Several plaintiffs filed a motion to transfer the COVID-19 business loss lawsuits on April 20, asking the panel to centralize the claims before one judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, to avoid contradictory rulings and schedules from different Courts and prevent duplicative discovery into common issues in the cases.

In subsequent filings, some plaintiffs have proposed the litigation be centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois or other venues, and some insurance carriers have filed oppositions to the establishment of consolidated proceedings at all, indicating that all of the claims should not be centralized since different facts and policy language are involved in the claims.

It is estimated thousands of similar complaints will likely be filed in the coming months, as more small businesses are pushed to the brink only to find their insurance companies are denying payments on policies they purchased. Some reports indicate as many as 140 such lawsuits have actually already been filed at the state and federal level.

Most of the lawsuits claim insurers have said they will not cover losses caused by viruses, and that they have provisions in their insurance contracts which state this. However, many businesses claim such causes only apply if there is loss due to an employee or customer illness on the property. However, in the current pandemic, numerous plaintiffs indicate that their business losses stem from government “stay-at-home” orders, which caused them to close temporarily. In addition, some plaintiffs say their insurance policies did not even contain a specific exclusion for viruses.

In complex product liability litigation, where a large number of claims are filed throughout the federal court system by individuals who suffered similar injuries as a result of the same or similar products or venues, it is common for the federal court system to centralize the litigation for pretrial proceedings. However, if settlements are not reached during discovery or following a series of early “bellwether” trials, each claim may later be remanded back to the U.S. District Court where it was originally filed to go before a jury.


"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer
Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer "Representative" (Posted 2 days ago)

Bard claims two cases selected for the third and fourth bellwether trials are no longer representative of the litigation due to the plaintiffs' worsening injuries and need for additional surgeries due to their failed hernia mesh products.