Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
CPSC Warns SwaddleMe By Your Bed Sleepers May Put Infants’ Lives At Risk January 23, 2020 Russell Maas Add Your Comments Federal safety officials indicate that a brand of bed-side infant sleepers may pose a serious and potentially life-threatening risk for babies, warning consumers to stop using the product while regulators are working to get them recalled, due to the risk that infants may roll over and become entrapped or suffocate. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued the “SwaddleMe By Your Bed Sleeper” warning on January 16, instructing the public to stop using the inclined sleepers immediately, after more than 70 infant fatalities have been linked to similar designs on other sleeper products. Inclining infant sleepers and bassinets are designed to elevate the baby’s head and torso. Inclining the infant during sleep is intended to help prevent acid-reflux or congestion. However, the design has proven to be potentially deadly after babies are old enough to roll over on their own, or if the incline of the bassinet forces the child’s chin down to his or her neck, creating an airway blockage. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The CPSC’s warning includes SwaddleMe By Your Bed Sleepers manufactured by Summer Infant’s Inc. and sold throughout the United States at various retailers and online through Amazon.com. While the CPSC has not received any reported fatalities or injuries specifically associated with the SwaddleMe By Your Bed Sleeper products, the agency’s evaluation and outside expert analysis have deemed the products unsafe for infants. The CPSC is pressing for Summer Infant’s Inc. to issue a recall of the products, but have not yet reached an agreement with the manufacturer to do so. At this time, the CPSC is unaware of how many SwaddleMe By Your Bed Sleepers may have been sold to consumers. The warning and the negotiations over the recall come as some lawmakers seek to give the CPSC more power to warn consumers about dangerous products and potentially force manufacturers to pull dangerous products off the market. U.S. Representative Bobby L. Rush introduced the Safety Hazard and Recall Efficiency (SHARE) Information Act on January 9, which would amend The Consumer Product Safety Act, by allowing the governing agency to provide consumers critical information regarding hazardous products in a timely manner, without the expressed permission from manufacturers and without the threat of facing a lawsuit from the manufacturer. The legislation would also increase the civil penalties on those who violate information sharing requirements or continue to selling dangerous products. Rush said the legislation came, in part, as a result of the inclined sleepers problems, which were known for years before the public was warned. Inclined Sleeper Risks The warning and legislation follow a series of recalls and investigations that have questioned the safety of all infant inclined sleeper products, with many experts claiming the products are unsafe because they can allow an infant’s head to slump forward and interfere with breathing, leading to suffocation and death. Inclined infant sleeper safety concerns were disclosed to the public in April 2019, when the CPSC issued a Fisher-Price Rock’n Play warning, instructing consumers to stop placing their infants in the sleepers by three months old, or before they begin to show signs that they can roll over independently. In response to the warning, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) challenged the commissions warning, noting that parents will not know the exact moment a child gains the ability to roll over. Several manufacturers issued recalls of inclined sleepers following the warning, including Fisher-Price’s recall of 4.7 million Rock’n Play Sleepers and a recall of 694,000 Kids II inclined rocking sleepers. Fischer-Price subsequently released an additional inclined sleeper recall in June, impacting 71,000 inclined sleeping accessories sold with their Ultra-Lite Day & Night Play Yards. The CPSC sponsored an independent inclined infant sleeper study by Erin Mannen, Ph.D., a mechanical engineer specializing in biomechanics at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, to determine whether inclined sleep products are safe for consumer use, and found none of the inclined sleep products her team tested offered a safe sleep environment for infants. Devices with over a 10 degree angle in particular created increased sleep hazards. After the study was concluded, the CPSC voted to move forward with a proposed ban on all inclined sleepers for infants in October 2019. To date, the CPSC has received 1,108 incidents, including 73 infant deaths related to infant inclined sleep products that occurred from January 2005 through June 2019. Retailers such as Amazon, Buy Buy Baby, eBay, Walmart, and several other major outlets have pledged to stop selling infant inclined sleepers as a result. However, it is estimated that millions remain in consumers and daycare facilities possession. Fischer-Price faces a number of inclined sleeper individual wrongful death lawsuits, as well as a class action lawsuit alleging the manufacturer knew or should have known about the risk of problems, yet delayed announcing a recall or warning, and knowingly allowed parents to continue purchasing life threatening sleeper devices. More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order April 1, 2025 Judge Rejects J&J’s Third Bankruptcy Filing, Killing $9B Talcum Powder Settlement April 1, 2025 Igloo Cooler Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Fingertip Amputation Risks April 1, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025) Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025) Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)
Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)
Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)