Chesapeake Regional Lawsuits Filed by Nearly 1,000 Women Who May Have Undergone Unnecessary Surgeries
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Cranial Drills May Not Stop Once They Reach The Brain, FDA Warns September 29, 2015 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Federal regulators warn that more than 200 patients have suffered severe injuries associated with use of certain cranial drills, which are designed to cut through the skull and stop before damaging the brain. However, the reports suggest that some of the drills may not stop once they reach the brain.ย The FDA issued a safety communication on September 28, warning that cranial perforators with an automatic clutch mechanism may fail to disengage once they hit brain tissue. The warning is not specific to any manufacturer, as the FDA indicates this may be an industry-wide problem if neurosurgeons fail to follow very specific procedures and operating instructions. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Cranial perforators are drills that are used to create a small hole in a patient’s skull. This allows neurosurgeons to operate on the brain. From January 2005 through August 2015, the FDA received more than 300 medical device reports (MDRs) linked to incidents where the automatic clutch mechanism on cranial perforators failed to disengage. According to the agency, this resulted in more than 200 patient injuries. The FDA indicates that the injuries included perforation of the brain’s protective covering, bleeding, brain contusion, cerebral tissue damage and brain damage that led to decreased functioning. Patients have reportedly suffered seizures, damage to the part of the brain responsible for language, as well as increased hospitalization time and the need for additional procedures. “Most cranial perforators are designed to automatically stop drilling after penetrating the skull to prevent the tip from unintentionally drilling or ‘plunging’ into the brain,” the FDA warning notes. “However, this clutch mechanism may fail to disengage if proper use, patient considerations, and device selection are not followed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions for use.” Following the instructions properly, making sure to adjust for patient considerations, and selecting the proper device in accordance to manufacturer instructions can mitigate the risk of injury, the agency advised. The FDA also specifically advised neurosurgeons to select the appropriate cutting accessories based on the thickness of the patient’s skull, hold the perforator perpendicular to the inner table of the skull throughout the procedure without rocking, rotating or changing the angle of the device while drilling, and to avoid using excessive pressure when near the point of perforation. The agency also warned that neurosurgeons should be cautious about perforating areas of the skull that have variations in thickness and contour, perforating the skulls of infants, children, or elderly patients, and perforating a patient’s skull if they have disease or fragile bone or adherent underlying dura mater. Neurosurgeons and patients are being told to report any cranial drill problems to the FDA’s Medwatch Adverse Event Reporting Program. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Brain Injury, Cranial Perforator, Medical Mistake, Surgical Error More Lawsuit Stories Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks March 10, 2026 Uber Sexual Assault MDL Judge Considered Expanding Jury Pool in Next Bellwether Trial March 10, 2026 Chesapeake Regional Lawsuits Filed by Nearly 1,000 Women Who May Have Undergone Unnecessary Surgeries March 10, 2026 0 Comments PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: today) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026) Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (Posted: yesterday) A Georgia couple’s lawsuit claims the makers of Dupixent failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of mycosis fungoides, a type of T-cell lymphoma. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026)MDL Sought for Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (02/19/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent for Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema Treatment Caused CTCL (02/10/2026) Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Blood Clot Results in Lawsuit Against Device Manufacturer (02/04/2026)SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges AngioDynamics Catheter Defects Forced Surgical Removal (01/30/2026)Severe Sepsis Infection Leads to Vortex Port Catheter Wrongful Death Lawsuit (01/12/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks March 10, 2026
Chesapeake Regional Lawsuits Filed by Nearly 1,000 Women Who May Have Undergone Unnecessary Surgeries March 10, 2026
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: today) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)
Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (Posted: yesterday) A Georgia couple’s lawsuit claims the makers of Dupixent failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of mycosis fungoides, a type of T-cell lymphoma. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026)MDL Sought for Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (02/19/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent for Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema Treatment Caused CTCL (02/10/2026)
Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (Posted: 4 days ago) In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Blood Clot Results in Lawsuit Against Device Manufacturer (02/04/2026)SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges AngioDynamics Catheter Defects Forced Surgical Removal (01/30/2026)Severe Sepsis Infection Leads to Vortex Port Catheter Wrongful Death Lawsuit (01/12/2026)