DaVita Dialysis Lawsuit Over Cardiac Arrests Results in $383.5M Verdict

A wrongful death lawsuit brought by the families of three dialysis patients resulted in a $383.5 million verdict against DaVita, which provided dialysis treatments with GranuFlo, which allegedly caused the sudden cardiac arrest for each of the patients. 

The verdict was returned by a federal jury in Denver on Wednesday, determining that the company was responsible for the cardiac arrest deaths because staff members used the dialysate GranuFlo, and knew or should have known that it may increase the risk of heart problems.

The lawsuits alleged that DaVita employees ignored a number of health signals, such as major blood changes, and reports of deaths and severe injuries within the medical community involving GranuFlo dialysis treatments.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The verdict awarded the three families between $1.5 million and $5 million each for compensatory damages, and then added another $125 million in punitive damages for each family, which was meant to punish DaVita for recklessly endangering dialysis patients.

The company has said it intends to appeal the decision.

The case stems from a March 2012 recall issued after federal health regulators discovered that Granuflo and Naturalyte solutions may increase the risk that dialysis patients suffer sudden cardiac arrest or die during or shortly after treatment.

Concerns about the link between NaturaLyte, Granuflo and cardiac arrest reports first surfaced in early 2012, after an internal memos of the manufacturer, Fresenius, were leaked to the FDA.

Although the company indicated in the internal memo that it was aware of at least 941 instances where patients suffered sudden cardiac arrest during dialysis treatment at their own clinics in 2010, Fresenius failed to take actions to ensure that all doctors using Granuflo or NaturaLyte were aware of the problems.

In November 2011, the company issued warnings to doctors at Fresenius clinics, indicating that doctors should closely monitor bicarbonate levels during treatments. However, the same warnings were not provided to other clinics that used GranuFlo and NaturaLyte. In addition, lawsuits allege that the manufacturer knew or should have known about the risk of problems long before the internal memo was issued.

Fresenius finally provided a warning letter to all healthcare providers in March 2012, which the FDA classified as a recall of GranuFlo and NaturaLyte.

In February 2016, Fresenius agreed to settle thousands of GranuFlo and NaturaLyte lawsuits for a total of about $250 million.

Each of the complaints raised similar allegations that the dialysis treatment provider failed to adequately warn doctors about the importance of closely monitoring patients receiving GranuFlo or NaturaLyte diaysate solutions, which have been found to raise bicarbonate levels and increasing the risk of sudden cardiac arrest or death during or shortly after hemodialysis.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




3 Comments


Daphine
Hi, my children just found out yesterday that their dad’s passing was a result of Davita and the portals that they were using, My question is are spouses able to file as well

Michelle
My mom died as a result of these dialysis errors

Michael
Do I have to Die or lose an organ before I can file a lawsuit? Shortened Run Times, Hand Cramps, Headaches and Muscle Tension during the last hour of Treatment. Met with Facility Admin., Neph., DaVita Case Worker and Rep. from Corp.. Expresed my string concern for not getting full run times. That was April 8th, they are getting better, but under the current guidelines, my shortened run times disqualifies me for a Transplant because I am “Non-Compliant”. Can anyone help me? I have allot more information!

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

New testing has identified states with the highest levels of cancer-linked PFAS contamination in drinking water, following decades of unregulated use and disposal of firefighting foam and industrial chemicals by the U.S. military and other industries.
Victims and families are speaking out after a wave of tabletop fire pit explosions left people with severe burns, permanent injuries, and in some cases, claimed lives.
A neurosurgeon and a personal injury lawyer weigh in on new evidence linking Depo-Provera to brain tumors, as lawsuits mount against Pfizer over failure to warn about meningioma risks.