Dorel Car Seat Lawsuit Results in $34M Verdict After Child Paralyzed

A Texas jury has awarded $34.4 million in damages over spinal cord injuries suffered by a toddler placed in a forward-facing Dorel car set, including $10 million in punitive damages awarded against the manufacturer of the child safety equipment due to gross negligence. 

The verdict stems from a product liability complaint (PDF) filed last year by Nicole and Cameron Hinson, on behalf of Nicole Hinson’s son, Cayden, who was partially paralyzed in May 2013, when he was 20 months old. The lawsuit accused Dorel Juvenile Group of failing to warn about risks associated with placing a child under the age of two in a forward facing Dorel Safety 1st Summit Deluxe car seat.

At the time of the crash, Cayden was strapped into the Dorel safety seat facing forward in the back seat. Despite the safety restraint, the child suffered a brain injury and a spinal cord injury during the accident, and will never walk again under his own power, according to evidence presented at trial.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

“Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. was negligent in marketing the subject car seat for use with children (Cayden’s) age given the medical risks presented in a severe frontal collision,” the lawsuit stated. “Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. was also negligent in failing to adequately warn consumers and customers of the risks posed to young children positioned in a forward facing car seat as opposed to a rear-facing car seat.”

According to internal documents from Dorel that were presented during the trial, the company knew as early as 2009 that forward-facing car seats were not safe for children under the age of 2, yet failed to adequately warn consumers. Prior to that date, the American Academy of Pediatrics had specifically highlighted the risk of spinal and brain injuries from forward facing car seats during auto accidents.

On June 17, a federal jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas determined that Dorel failed to provide adequate warning and was guilty of negligence and gross negligence, bearing 80% responsibility for the boy’s injuries. The driver of the other vehicle involved in the frontal collision, Stacey Tilley, was deemed 20% responsible.

The lawsuit also accused Wal-Mart Stores of some responsibility, for reportedly installing two new tires on Tilly’s vehicle incorrectly, however the jury disagreed.

The jury awarded the family $24.4 million in compensatory damages, and ordered Dorel pay another $10 million in punitive damages for gross negligence.


"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard 3DMax Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin in April 2024
Bard 3DMax Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin in April 2024 (Posted yesterday)

With thousands of Bard hernia mesh lawsuits pending in the federal court system, a fourth bellwether trial will be held in the spring, involving allegations that defects with Bard 3DMax caused painful and permanent injuries.

Ozempic Gastroparesis Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About Permanent Stomach Problems
Ozempic Gastroparesis Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About Permanent Stomach Problems (Posted 3 days ago)

A South Dakota man has filed one of the first gastroparesis lawsuits against Ozempic manufacturers, alleging that users have not been adequately warned about the risk of severe vomiting and long-term stomach side effects.