FDA Study Seeks To Understand Effects Of Drug Names On Consumers, Doctors

Federal drug regulators plan to launch a study focusing on how consumers and healthcare providers perceive new drug names, amid continuing concerns about the risk of medication mistakes and confusion.

In a Federal Register Notice posted January 21, the FDA announced the launch of a study focusing on how drug names affect consumers and doctors. Researchers want to know if a brand name can affect how consumers and healthcare providers view a drug’s effectiveness.

FDA researchers will ask 500 consumers and 500 healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, and physician assistants, to answer questions about seven different drugs and the proposed names.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The names will include pretested extreme names, neutral names, and five target (to be tested) names. Participants will answer questions before and after they are told what the drug’s is intended to treat. The study will be conducted by the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) and is reportedly the first of its kind.

Some of the names will be an “extreme, explicitly suggestive” name like “CureAll” and another will be purposefully neutral. Researchers want to see whether drug names that overstate the efficacy affects consumer perception.

The typical naming process involves drug makers submitting their proposed names to the FDA for approval. Often, manufacturers will hire branding agencies to help create a name that helps patients and doctors draw relevant connections to what the drug does.

However, there are FDA naming guidelines that must be followed. For example, pharmaceutical companies cannot use names that specify a drug’s attributes. They also cannot use names that are too similar to those already on the market.

OPDP also focuses on reviewing names that overstate efficacy or safety of the drug, suggest superiority without substantiation of the superiority, or are fanciful in nature, which can imply unique effectiveness that other drugs don’t feature.

The new study will focus on target names that vary in ways that the efficacy of the drug may be more apparent by some names than others, or will clearly imply an indication or benefits compared to others.

The FDA hopes knowing how consumers and healthcare providers perceive these differences will help the agency with how it regulates drug naming going forward.

Public comment for the study proposal will be open until March 23, 2020. Details on submitting public comment are detailed in the Federal Register notice.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference
Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference (Posted today)

The judge presiding over all Change Healthcare lawsuits filed in federal court is holding the first status conference of the litigation, which is expected to grow significantly as Change Healthcare data breach letters continue to be sent to impacted customers.

Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury
Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury (Posted yesterday)

Complaint comes as a panel of federal judges are scheduled to hear oral arguments later this month, to determine whether all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide should be centralized before one judge.