Skip Navigation

Faberware Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit Claims Defective Walmart Device Caused Severe Burn Injuries

Faberware Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit Claims Defective Walmart Device Caused Severe Burn Injuries

A Texas man has filed a Farberware pressure cooker lawsuit claiming the appliance exploded while he was cooking, causing permanent burn injuries to his face, chest and arms.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Andre Owens in the U.S. District Court of Texas on May 21, naming Walmart Inc., the manufacturer and seller of the pressure cooker, as the defendant.

The Farberware 7-in-1 Programmable pressure cooker is a consumer kitchen appliance that uses high pressure to cook food rapidly. The device is typically designed with interlocking safety features intended to keep the lid secure when pressure builds to prevent users from opening the cooker while it is pressurized.

Although the devices have become increasingly popular, numerous recalls and pressure cooker lawsuits have alleged that faulty safety features may allow the devices to explode or open while pressurized, spewing scalding contents onto users and causing severe burns.

Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer

Pressure Cooker Injury Allegations

According to the lawsuit, Owens used the Farberware pressure cooker on May 25, 2024 to prepare chicken and dumplings. After the cooking cycle ended, he attempted to open the lid, when the pressure cooker suddenly exploded.

Owens indicates the pressure cooker lid blew off with extreme force, despite the failsafe features of the product. The explosion spewed scalding liquid and steam across his body causing serious burn injuries to his abdomen, chest, neck, face, chin and arms.

The filing states that Farberwareโ€™s safety manual says the lid can only be removed once the pressure level lowers to required levels. However, Owens was able to remove the lid with built-up pressure still inside the unit.

Moreover, Walmart was allegedly aware of other exploding pressure cooker incidents linked to the defective design of the safety features, yet failed to take corrective action of any kind, including warning consumers or issuing a product recall.

โ€œDefendant was previously aware of other incidents of exploding pressure cookers due to the identical design and manufacturing defects in the pressure cooker that maimed Plaintiff, yet Defendant failed to take adequate corrective action, including providing supplemental warnings, remedying the defect, withdrawing the product from sale, or otherwise protecting consumers from the latent danger caused by those known defects.โ€

Andre Owens v. Walmart Inc.

The lawsuit presents claims of strict products liability design defect, manufacturing defect, marketing defect, failure to warn, negligence and post-sale failure to warn, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, gross negligence and deceptive trade practices.

It seeks punitive and compensatory damages for Owensโ€™ physical pain and suffering, mental anguish, physical impairment, disfigurement, medical expenses, future medical expenses, lost wages and loss of earning capacity.

Pressure Cooker Injury Lawsuits

Owensโ€™ complaint is one of many pressure cooker explosion lawsuits filed in recent years against major brands and retailers, including Instant Pot, Shark Ninja, Crock-Pot and others. 

The lawsuits allege the electric kitchen devices suffer from major safety design flaws that allow for unsafe cooking conditions.

Pressure cooker injury attorneys are investigating potential claims on behalf of consumers harmed by the exploding devices. Individuals who suffered burns or other serious complications following one of these incidents may be eligible to pursue compensation for their damages.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Image Credit: Shutterstock.com / Bruce VanLoon
Martha Garcia
Written By: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Federal regulators have expanded an Omnipod recall after reports that internal tubing defects may cause insulin leaks and under-delivery, potentially triggering dangerous blood sugar spikes.
Growing reports of GalaFLEX breast mesh complications have raised concerns about women who required explant surgery, revision procedures or implant removal after the synthetic mesh was used during breast augmentation, breast lift, implant revision or reconstruction surgery.
Pfizer continues to face Depo-Provera lawsuits from across the U.S., including one by a woman who says she learned of her brain tumor nearly 30 years after she stopped receiving the injections.

About the writer

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.