Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Fix Needed For Generic Drug Side Effects Labeling Loophole, Doctors Warn November 1, 2012 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A prominent medical journal is warning that a lack of drug safety labeling enforcement for generic drugs is putting patients at risk, and generic drug makers may be able to escape liability for failure to warn about known side effects associated with medications they produce. In an opinion piece published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine, doctors call for action to be taken to close a loophole created by a recent Supreme Court decision, which lets generic drug manufacturers off the hook for not mentioning dangerous, sometimes deadly, side effects on the their labels. The writers, Drs. Aaron S. Kesselheim, Jerry Avorn and Jeremy A. Greene, suggested a number of possible solutions in order to protect patients. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Pliva v. Mensing Granted Generic Drug Makers Immunity The decision, Pliva v. Mensing, was handed down in 2011 by the U.S. Supreme Court, finding that failure to warn lawsuits against generic drug manufacturers are pre-empted by federal regulations that require generic medications to carry the same warnings that are provided with the name brand equivalent. As a result of the ruling, courts have found that generic drug makers can not be held liable for providing inaccurate or misleading information about the health risks associated with medications they manufacture and sell. FDA rules require that generic drug makers copy the label warnings of the original product exactly. The generics manufacturers have used these regulations to argue that they can not be sued when consumers are injured, even if there is evidence that they knew about the potential side effects caused by their medications. Thousands of product liability lawsuits pending against the manufacturers of generic medications have been dismissed in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, including lawsuits over generic Reglan, Accutane, Darvocet and others. In many cases consumers are not able to control whether they receive a generic version of a medication, and certainly are not being told that they may be left without a remedy if they use a generic equivalent. The FDA and others have suggested that the rules were never meant to prohibit new warnings from being added, but the Supreme Court’s conservative judges declared the generic companies immune from prosecution in failure to warn lawsuits in a 5-4 split down ideological lines. Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, said he was fully aware that the decision left patients in danger, and said it was congress’s job to fix it. Legislation Stalled in Congress Bipartisan legislation to do just that has been stalled in congress almost since the decision was handed down. However, in the New England Journal of Medicine “Persective” article, the doctors suggest that the solutions offered in the current bill are impractical, because the bill puts the weight of discovering and reporting new adverse drug side effects directly on the generic manufacturer. “Imposing vague liability and postmarketing surveillance responsibilities on large numbers of generic-drug manufacturers, many of them small companies that are ill-prepared to undertake such surveillance, may be ineffective in generating sufficient knowledge about drug safety and could make these products more expensive, creating a Catch-22,” the editorial states. Instead, they suggest that a central information database be created for the collection and study of late-arising side effects. This repository would be overseen by the FDA. When problems were discovered, a centrally written consensus label could be created for the generic. The cost could be off-set by a minimal fee on generic drugs that still would leave them significantly cheaper than their originals. They also suggest creating a fund for compensating patients that are injured by a generic drug when the side effects were not known when the brand-name version was on the market. A similar system exists for vaccine side effects, which shield vaccine makers from litigation to ensure that the supply is not affected. Tags: Congress, Drug Side Effects, Generic Drug, Supreme Court More Lawsuit Stories Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye April 25, 2025 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Roles in MDL April 25, 2025 Huffy Ride-On Vehicle Recalls Issued Due to Fire, Burn Injury Risks April 25, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye (Posted: today) Following 52 years as a cosmetologist, a New Jersey woman says she developed bladder cancer due to routine exposure to hair color chemicals. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Dye Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Wrongful Death of Salon Professional (04/11/2025)Hairdresser Bladder Cancer Lawsuits Target L’Oréal, Henkel, Wella, Clairol and Other Popular Salon Dye Manufacturers (04/04/2025)Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (03/28/2025) Galaxy Gas Lawsuit Filed Over Nitrous Oxide Addiction and Brain Injury Risks (Posted: yesterday) A class action lawsuit has been filed against Galaxy Gas and several associated companies, alleging the product is marketed to teens using sweet flavors and deceptive safety claims, leading to widespread addiction and neurological injuries. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITGalaxy Gas Seeks Dismissal of Lawsuit Over Nitrous Oxide Death (04/21/2025)Nitrous Oxide Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Fatal Side Effects of Flavored Gas Sold In Vape Shops (04/02/2025) 500 Suboxone Tooth Decay Cases Randomly Selected for Bellwether Record Collection Pool (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has randomly selected a group of 500 Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits to go through case-specific discovery and further workup, which may eventually be eligible for early bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITStatus of Suboxone Tooth Loss Lawsuits To Be Reviewed at MDL Conference (04/16/2025)Prenatal Opioid Exposure May Result in Smaller Brains Among Newborns: Study (04/14/2025)Suboxone Lawsuit Filing Deadline Nears for Many Tooth Decay Claims in 3-Year SOL States (04/07/2025)
Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye (Posted: today) Following 52 years as a cosmetologist, a New Jersey woman says she developed bladder cancer due to routine exposure to hair color chemicals. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Dye Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Wrongful Death of Salon Professional (04/11/2025)Hairdresser Bladder Cancer Lawsuits Target L’Oréal, Henkel, Wella, Clairol and Other Popular Salon Dye Manufacturers (04/04/2025)Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (03/28/2025)
Galaxy Gas Lawsuit Filed Over Nitrous Oxide Addiction and Brain Injury Risks (Posted: yesterday) A class action lawsuit has been filed against Galaxy Gas and several associated companies, alleging the product is marketed to teens using sweet flavors and deceptive safety claims, leading to widespread addiction and neurological injuries. MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITGalaxy Gas Seeks Dismissal of Lawsuit Over Nitrous Oxide Death (04/21/2025)Nitrous Oxide Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Fatal Side Effects of Flavored Gas Sold In Vape Shops (04/02/2025)
500 Suboxone Tooth Decay Cases Randomly Selected for Bellwether Record Collection Pool (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has randomly selected a group of 500 Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits to go through case-specific discovery and further workup, which may eventually be eligible for early bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITStatus of Suboxone Tooth Loss Lawsuits To Be Reviewed at MDL Conference (04/16/2025)Prenatal Opioid Exposure May Result in Smaller Brains Among Newborns: Study (04/14/2025)Suboxone Lawsuit Filing Deadline Nears for Many Tooth Decay Claims in 3-Year SOL States (04/07/2025)