Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
FDA Releases Final Food Transport Safety Rule April 7, 2016 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsA new food safety rule will require transporters to undertake a series of sanitary practices to avoid contamination and food poisoning outbreaks, including thorough vehicle cleanings, proper refrigeration, and bacteria exposure prevention.ย The FDA announced the new food safety transportation rule on April 5, which will apply to all shippers, loaders, and carriers intending to distribute or supply human or animal food products for consumption within the U.S. by motor vehicle or rail.The regulatory agency has initiated several new efforts to improve food transportation safety since January 2013, all focusing on requiring handlers and producers to use sanitary practices that avoid food safety risks.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that nearly 48 million people are impacted by some sort of foodborne illness, resulting in about 128,000 hospitalizations and sometimes over 3,000 deaths each year. Most food poisoning illnesses are preventable through the use of sanitary farming, production, and transportation methods.The scope of the recently finalized rule passed by the FDA mandates all persons and shippers who intend to have human or animal food products shipped into the U.S. to be distributed by rail or motor vehicle, and all domestically produced foods products transported by the same methods to be properly refrigerated. It also calls for improvements in the design of transporting vehicles to properly store and protect food products, and adequate cleaning of vehicles between loads.Food products that are not properly stored or transported in necessary temperatures may begin growing bacteria or spoil prematurely, which can lead to consumer consumption of mold.The rule outlines specific transportation operations that include measures such as adequate temperature controls, the separation of raw foods from ready-to-eat foods, prevention of transporting potentially contaminated nonfood items within the same load as food products, and policies that prevent the potential of cross contamination among food and nonfood items.The FDAโs rule also mandates specifics regarding the design and maintenance of vehicles and transportation equipment so that it offers increased safety to the products packaging from becoming damaged during transport.“Consumers deserve a safe food supply and this final rule will help to ensure that all those involved in the farm-to-fork continuum are doing their part to ensure that the food products that arrive in our grocery stores are safe to eat,” FDA deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine, Michael R. Taylor, said in the press release. “We recognize the importance of education and training in achieving widespread compliance, and we are committed to working with both industry and our government partners to ensure effective implementation of all of the new food safety rules under the Food Safety Modernization Act.”Training will be required for carrier personnel to ensure they are following all of the sanitary practices and will also be responsible for documenting cleanings between loads. Maintenance of records of written procedure, agreements, and training will be required of the carrier and be held for specific lengths of time depending upon the type of record and the type of food products being distributed.The rule will be enforceable exactly one year following its publication for larger business and two years following for smaller companies. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Food, Food PoisoningMore Lawsuit Stories J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits July 29, 2026 CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use July 29, 2026 Instant Pot Duo Nova Lawsuit Alleges Defective Pressure Cooker Caused Serious Burns July 29, 2026 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: today)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026) Chlorpyrifos Exposure Lawsuit Claims Pesticide Caused Farmer’s Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday)A chlorpyrifos lawsuit claims years of exposure through residence and work left a California man with a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (07/22/2026)Chlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023) Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)Abbott faces a Proclaim spinal cord stimulator lawsuit by a man who says the device not only failed, but that he was repeatedly electrocuted when sales representatives without medical licenses tried to reprogram it.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Boston Scientific Sales Reps Made Unauthorized Device Adjustments (07/13/2026)
J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: today)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)
Chlorpyrifos Exposure Lawsuit Claims Pesticide Caused Farmer’s Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday)A chlorpyrifos lawsuit claims years of exposure through residence and work left a California man with a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (07/22/2026)Chlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023)
Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)Abbott faces a Proclaim spinal cord stimulator lawsuit by a man who says the device not only failed, but that he was repeatedly electrocuted when sales representatives without medical licenses tried to reprogram it.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Claims Boston Scientific Sales Reps Made Unauthorized Device Adjustments (07/13/2026)