Fosamax Settlement Master Appointed in Federal Jaw Litigation

A federal judge has appointed a well-respected law professor to oversee settlement talks aimed at reaching a resolution in hundreds of Fosamax jaw decay lawsuits filed by individuals throughout the United States. 

John D. Feerick, Dean Emeritus of the Fordham University School of law was appointed Special Settlement Master on November 22, by U.S. District Judge John F. Keenan, who is presiding over the federal multidistrict ligitation (MDL) for all federal lawsuits involving jaw problems from Fosamax.

Once Feerick has been brought up to speed on the litigation, he will attempt to facilitate a Fosamax settlement agreement between Merck and plaintiffs who claim that the osteoporosis drug caused them to suffer decay of the jaw bone, known as osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ).

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Feerick was appointed to help facilitate a resolution for the Fosamax jaw litigation before Judge Keenan considers remanding individual lawsuits back to the federal district courts where they were originally filed for individual trials throughout the country.

There are currently more than 900 product liability lawsuits over Fosamax jaw necrosis filed in federal court against Merck, with another couple hundred cases pending in New Jersey and other state courts. All of the complaints involve similar allegations that Merck failed to adequately warn consumers and doctors about the risk of Fosamax side effects.

Fosamax (alendronate sodium) is an oral bisphosphonate medication, which has been associated with decay of the jawbone when taken long-term or at high doses. With a very long half-life of 10 years, most of the Fosamax claims argue that dose accumulation over time increases the risk of ONJ; where the jaw bone begins to decay and can result in bone showing through the skin. In some cases full or partial jaw removal is required.

Merck has successfully defended its medication in all but one of the Fosamax jaw cases that have gone to trial so far. In the one trial where the plaintiff was successful in establishing that the medication caused her jaw problems, the jury awarded $8 million in damages from Fosamax. However, Judge Keenan subsequently ruled that the verdict was excessive and the plaintiff elected to have another trial rather than accepting Keenan’s reduced award of $1.5 million. Merck is currently appealing that verdict on other grounds.

In addition to the jaw litigation, Merck also faces a growing number of Fosamax lawsuits over sudden femur fractures, which have been consolidated before U.S. District Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr. in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey as part of a separate multidistrict litigation (MDL).

1 Comments

  • caroleJanuary 10, 2012 at 12:55 am

    Took actonel 5-05 to 10-08(3 mo supply);Boniva 3-09; alendronate sodium 4-09 to 10-10. Lost 2 dental implants 10/11-10. Saw oral surgeon 11-10; finally diagnosed with osteonecrosis 5-2011; required IV antiobiotics 5 weeks; 3 months oral antibiotics

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status Conference To Be Held With MDL Judge This Week
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status Conference To Be Held With MDL Judge This Week (Posted today)

U.S. District Judge presiding over all federal hair relaxer lawsuits will meet with lawyers involved in the litigation on Thursday, to discuss the status of the claims and when to move forward with bellwether cases.

Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025
Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025 (Posted yesterday)

A series of four bellwether claims in the baby formula NEC lawsuit MDL will be ready to go before a federal juries in May 2025, August 2025, November 2025 and February 2026 according to a proposed trial schedule agreed upon by both plaintiffs and defendants.