Four Loko Injury Lawsuits Result in Insurance Coverage Dispute

The makers of the alcoholic drink Four Loko, which was also once sold as an energy drink, have filed a lawsuit against their insurers, alleging that the insurance companies did not provide enough coverage to protect the manufacturer against injury lawsuits filed by consumers who say they were harmed by the drink. 

According to a recent report by Law360, Phusion Projects Inc. filed a lawsuit earlier this month in Illinois state court against A.F. Crissie & Co. Ltd. and Selective Insurance Co. of South Carolina.

The lawsuit attempts to hold A.F. Crissie liable for damages in four Four Loko injury lawsuits brought by individuals who allege they suffered health problems from the alcoholic energy drink. Selective is targeted by claims that it has an obligation to defend and indemnify the company against Four Loko lawsuits.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The complaint stems from a ruling earlier this year by a federal judge who determined that two other insurance companies, Netherlands Insurance Co. and Indiana Insurance Co., did not have to cover Four Loko’s legal expenses, because of exclusions for liquor liabilities that were included in their contracts. Phusion claims that A.F. Crissie, contracted by the company in 2009 to find it adequate insurance, knew the drink was alcoholic and failed to provide the proper insurance coverage as contracted.

The company allegedly advised Phusion not to get liquor liability because it only sold to distributors.

In 2010, the FDA issued warning letters to all manufacturers of alcoholic caffeinated beverages, indicating that the combination of alcohol and caffeine was dangerous, effectively shutting down the alcoholic energy drink industry.

Four Loko was the most popular alcoholic energy drink on the market before those drinks were banned, with an estimated $200 million in annual sales. Chicago-based Phusion Projects, the makers of Four Loko, have reformulated the drink and removed the caffeine, guarana and other ingredients that are normally used in so-called energy drinks.

In its previous formulation, Four Loko had a 12% alcohol content, equivalent to about four beers, and three times the amount of caffeine as a regular cup of coffee, all in a 23.5-ounce can that sold for as little as $2.75. After nine Washington state college students were hospitalized for binge drinking Four Loko, it was dubbed “blackout in a can.”

Since the ban on alcoholic energy drinks, more attention has been focused on non-alcoholic energy drinks as well, following the death of a 14 year old California girl who suffered cardiac arrest last year that was allegedly caused by caffeine overdose after drinking two Monster Energy drinks over a 24 hour-period. Her parents are currently pursuing a wrongful death lawsuit against Monster Energy Corp.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) warns that children should not consumer any energy drinks, as the risk of caffein overdose may be especially harmful for children, who should not consume more than 100 mg of caffeine in a day. Most energy drinks currently on the market contain more than that amount and some have nearly three times as much.

A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association linked energy drinks to serious side effects, such as increased heart rate, sleep disturbances, hyperglycemia and diuresis. Other reports have indicated that emergency room visits from energy drinks are rising, doubling over the past four years.


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal (Posted yesterday)

A BioZorb lawsuit has been filed by several breast cancer survivors after the BioZorb implants moved out of place and failed to dissolve int he body, requiring surgical removal.

Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October
Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October (Posted yesterday)

A U.S. District Court judge has scheduled a fairness hearing for October in order to determine whether final approval should be granted to a $25 million Philips CPAP recall settlement agreement, which would pay former users $25 million to pay for future medical monitoring needs.