MRI Gadolinium Detected in Cerebrospinal Fluid: Study

Amid increasing concerns about the risk of health problems from MRI contrast dye retained in the body following an exam, the findings of new research suggest that the toxic metal can be detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) just hours after an individual is injured with a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). ย 

In a report published in the September issue of the medical journal Radiology, Swiss researchers add to the growing body of science that suggests gadolinium may build up in the brain, organs or other areas of the body.

In recent years, a number of studies have shown that deposits of the toxic metal used to enhance MRI scans may remain in the body, potentially resulting inย bone and joint pain, skin discoloration or thickening, persistent headaches, nerve damage and other problems.ย As a result, some in the medical community have started to recognize a new medication condition, known asย gadolinium deposition disease.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

In this latest study, researchers analyzed samples of cerebrospinal fluid from 60 patients who were injected with the GBCA Dotarem within the previous 60 days, with samples collected from January to December of 2016. They compared those samples to 22 others from patients who had not received gadolinium MRI contrast dye injections and two samples from patients who had received injections more than a year earlier.

According to the findings, concentrations of gadolinium in cerebrospinal fluid was high in the first eight hours following the injections. While it was nearly gone in most cases after 48 hours, traces of gadolinium were still detected in samples from at least two patients who received injections more than a year earlier.

Concentrations were higher in patients with kidney function problems,ย cerebral toxoplasmosis, and liver cirrhosis, the researchers noted.

“Gadolinium could be detected even in subjects with a presumably intact blood-brain barrier. This suggests GBCA penetration into CSF regardless of blood-brain barrier permeability,” the researchers wrote. “Although we examined the CSF penetration of only one type of GBCA, our findings strongly argue for future research to assess the pharmacokinetics and penetration into CSF of other GBCAs in conjunction with central nervous system lesions.”

Gadolinium Retention Concerns

Concerns emerged about the safety of MRI gadolinium contrast agents first emerged about a decade ago, when they were linked to the development of ย nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), a rare and life-threatening condition which was found to occur among patients with impaired kidney function, causing their skin to thicken and harden, severely restricting movement.

Sometimes referred to asย gadolinium associated systemic fibrosis, NSF is a painful disorder that has no known cure and often results in confinement to a wheelchair and then death.

In 2007, the FDA limited gadolinium contrast dosesย in most kidney patients and contraindicated it for others, which limited the risk of NSF.ย In September 2010, the FDA went even further and banned the use of Bayerโ€™sย Magnevistย on patients with kidney problems, due to the heightened risk of NSF.

The agency also required label changes for all gadolinium agents, warning healthcare professionals to screen patients before injecting gadolinium to identify those suffering from acute kidney injury or chronic, severe kidney disease.

However, manufacturers of the MRI contrast dye now face a new batch ofย gadolinium deposition disease lawsuitsย being pursued by individuals without any kidney problems, who developed severe and debilitating health problems they claim are linked to retention of gadolinium in the brain and body.

In September 2017, the FDAโ€™s Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee voted to recommend the FDA requireย new MRI contrast agent warningsย about the risk of gadolinium build up in the brain. However, in May the FDA concluded thatย gadolinium in the brain appeared to carry no threat of health effects.

In December 2017, the FDA issued a drug safety communication for gadolinium-based contrast agents, including Omniscan, OptiMark, Magnevist, Gadavist and others, providing new information about theย risk of gadolinium retention and potential side effects.

The FDA recommended that health care professionals consider the fact that the body retains gadolinium when deciding whether to give it to patients that may be at higher risk of health problems. These include women who are pregnant or think they may be pregnant, patients with kidney problems, children, and patients when inflammatory conditions. The recommendations also suggest that repeated use of the contrast agents be minimized where possible, particularly when MRIs are scheduled closely together.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




1 Comments


Joseph
In early February, 2018 my wife Dorothy Boyd had two MRIs with contrast dye to diagnose breast cancer, less then two weeks apart. She had a documented history of kidney problems as well as non alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver. After the MRI exams she had a simple double mastectomy. Her health quickly deteriorated, and on June 23, 2018 she passed away.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.
A federal judge has selected 10 hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as potential bellwether trials after altering the selection process to eliminate non-representative cases.
A Depo-Provera lawsuit indicates that a Washington state woman must receive ongoing medical monitoring and brain scans due to a high-risk brain tumor allegedly caused by the birth control shot.