Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Manufacturers Seek Dismissal of Hair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Over Uterine Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Risks Motion to dismiss argues that the hair relaxer class action lawsuit does not involve plaintiffs who suffered an actual injury, and that the claims are preempted by federal law. February 8, 2024 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments The manufacturers of Dark & Lovely, Just for Me, Optimum and other popular chemical straighteners have filed a motion to dismiss a consolidated hair relaxer class action lawsuit, which seeks economic damages for all consumers who claim they were unwittingly exposed to a risk of uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries, even if they have not been diagnosed with any specific health problems. The motion comes in response to a consolidated complaint filed by plaintiffs in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), which also includes thousands of individual hair relaxer uterine cancer lawsuits, ovarian cancer lawsuits and uterine fibroid lawsuits brought by women who claim they developed devastating injuries caused by endocrine disrupting chemicals in the products. However, the consumer class action seeks economic damages for all purchasers of the toxic hair relaxers. The litigation emerged late last year, following the publication of a study that highlighted a link between hair relaxers and uterine cancer, finding that women who regularly used the products face a 156% increased risk compared to women who did not relax their hair. Lawsuits now seek financial compensation for former users, indicating that manufacturers knew or should have known about the hair relaxer cancer risk, yet placed their desire for profits before the health and safety of women. HAIR RELAXER COMPENSATION Did you or a loved one use hair relaxer products? Uterine cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer may be caused by chemicals in hair relaxer. See if you are eligible for benefits. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION HAIR RELAXER COMPENSATION Did you or a loved one use hair relaxer products? Uterine cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer may be caused by chemicals in hair relaxer. See if you are eligible for benefits. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Given common questions of fact and law raised in hair relaxer lawsuits filed throughout the federal court system, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established coordinated pretrial proceedings in the Northern District of Illinois under U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland in January 2023, for coordinated discovery and a series of early trial dates to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that will apply to a large number of claims. Defendants Seek to Dismiss Hair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit On February 5, defendants filed a motion to dismiss hair relaxer class action lawsuits (PDF), claiming that damages of economic harm are preempted by federal law. They also argue that plaintiffs have not filed sufficient claim of injury, and that they lack standing to file a nationwide class action. “Plaintiffs are residents of only seventeen different states, yet they assert fraud, consumer protection, breach of warranty and unjust enrichment claims on behalf of residents of the other thirty-three states, as well as U.S. territories,” the motion states. “Similarly, Plaintiffs seeking medical monitoring costs are residents of just six states, but assert products liability claims on behalf of individuals residing in thirteen jurisdictions.” Even if the motion is successful, it will still leave the manufacturers facing thousands of individual hair relaxer injury lawsuits filed nationwide. February 2024 Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Update Judge Rowland indicated early in the litigation that the court will establish a bellwether process, where a small group of representative lawsuits involving different products and specific injuries will be prepared for early trial dates, which will help the parties weigh the strengths and weaknesses of their positions and promote settlement negotiations. In November, parties proposed competing draft hair relaxer lawsuit bellwether trial plans, which outlined a process for selecting potential bellwether cases and putting them through case-specific discovery in preparation for early trial dates. However, the parties have been unable to agree on several key points regarding the bellwether selections, as well as when the first trials should begin, and how big a factor general causation should play in the early phases of the litigation. While the outcome of these test trials will not have any impact on other Dark & Lovely lawsuits, Just for Me lawsuits and claims filed against the manufacturers of other products, the average amounts of jury awards may promote potential hair relaxer settlements that could avoid the need for thousands of individual claims to go to trial nationwide. Following coordinated discovery in the MDL and any early bellwether trials, if the parties fail to negotiate hair relaxer settlements for individuals diagnosed with uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine fibroids and other complications, Judge Rowland may later remand each individual lawsuit directly filed in the MDL back to the U.S. District Court where it would have originated for a separate trial. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, Endocrine Disruptors, Endometrial Cancer, Endometriosis, Hair Relaxer, Hair Straighteners, L'Oreal, Ovarian Cancer, Perm, Phthalates, Uterine Cancer, Uterine Fibroids Image Credit: Kelly Heck Photography Find Out If You Qualify for Hair Relaxer Compensation More Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Stories MDL Judge To Weigh Hair Relaxer Cancer Evidence in Mid-2026 September 11, 2025 Uterine Cancer Cases Expected to ‘Increase Substantially’ Over Next 30 Years: Study July 8, 2025 Link Between Hair Relaxers and Cancer To Be Examined by Court During “Science Day” July 3, 2025 0 Comments CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (Posted: today) A federal judge will hear oral arguments on Monday over whether Depo-Provera lawsuit failure to warn claims are preempted by federal law. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLink Between Depo-Provera and Meningioma Brain Tumors Ignored by Pfizer, Plaintiffs Indicate (09/22/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women (09/17/2025)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (09/03/2025) Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit Alleges Problems With Predatory Drivers Were Known for Years (Posted: yesterday) Rideshare company Lfyt faces a sexual assault lawsuit from a Georgia woman who says a driver exposed himself after she ordered a ride home from a babysitting job. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITTwo Uber Sexual Assault Bellwether Trials To Be Held in North Carolina (09/22/2025)Uber Passenger Sexual Assault Trial Underway in California State Court (09/10/2025)Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Set To Go Before Jury in Jan. 2026 (09/04/2025) Exploding Isopropyl Bottles Make Smokeless Fire Pits Inherently Dangerous, Lawsuits Claim (Posted: 2 days ago) Lawsuits allege tabletop fire pits are inherently dangerous because they encourage consumers to fuel them with ordinary isopropyl bottles, which can explode in seconds and cause devastating burn injuries. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITTabletop Fire Pit Recall Announced by Five Below Amid Growing Number of Burn Injury Lawsuits (09/18/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (09/12/2025)Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)
Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (Posted: today) A federal judge will hear oral arguments on Monday over whether Depo-Provera lawsuit failure to warn claims are preempted by federal law. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLink Between Depo-Provera and Meningioma Brain Tumors Ignored by Pfizer, Plaintiffs Indicate (09/22/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women (09/17/2025)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (09/03/2025)
Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit Alleges Problems With Predatory Drivers Were Known for Years (Posted: yesterday) Rideshare company Lfyt faces a sexual assault lawsuit from a Georgia woman who says a driver exposed himself after she ordered a ride home from a babysitting job. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITTwo Uber Sexual Assault Bellwether Trials To Be Held in North Carolina (09/22/2025)Uber Passenger Sexual Assault Trial Underway in California State Court (09/10/2025)Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Set To Go Before Jury in Jan. 2026 (09/04/2025)
Exploding Isopropyl Bottles Make Smokeless Fire Pits Inherently Dangerous, Lawsuits Claim (Posted: 2 days ago) Lawsuits allege tabletop fire pits are inherently dangerous because they encourage consumers to fuel them with ordinary isopropyl bottles, which can explode in seconds and cause devastating burn injuries. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITTabletop Fire Pit Recall Announced by Five Below Amid Growing Number of Burn Injury Lawsuits (09/18/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (09/12/2025)Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)