Skip Navigation

Eligible for a Heated Insole lawsuit?

Amazon Foot Warmer Lawsuit Alleges Heated Insoles Exploded, Caught Fire

Amazon Foot Warmer Lawsuit Alleges Heated Insoles Exploded, Caught Fire

A newly filed lawsuit claims that Amazon sold defective foot warmers to a Kansas woman that exploded while she was wearing them, causing severe burn injuries to her feet.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Joni Caddell in The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma on December 3, naming Amazon.com Inc. and Meisinuo as defendants.

Foot warmers, also known as heated insoles, are rechargeable shoe inserts that use built-in heating elements and a small battery pack to warm the user’s feet in cold conditions. They often include low, medium and high heat settings that can be adjusted by a button or, in some models, a smartphone app.

Although the products have gained popularity in recent years as a means of adding comfort and helping improve circulation, when the foot warmers are not properly designed or manufactured they can pose serious health risks, since the lithium-ion batteries may overheat, cause fires and severe burns.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has issued several recent warnings for some brands, including Tajarly and iHeat. The alerts follow injuries and incidents in which batteries ignited or exploded, sometimes even when the devices were turned off.

As a result of the severe burn injuries associated with the products, attorneys are now investigating heated insole lawsuits, as well as claims for injuries arising from other electric foot and sock warmers.

Heated-Insole-Lawsuit-Electric-Foot-Warmer-Lawsuit
Heated-Insole-Lawsuit-Electric-Foot-Warmer-Lawsuit

According to the lawsuit, Caddell purchased the heated insoles from Amazon in November 2023, after seeing that they were advertised on the platform as rechargeable foot warmers suitable for outdoor use. The complaint states the product was stocked, marketed and shipped through site’s “Fulfillment by Amazon” program, which handled warehousing, order processing and delivery.

However, the insoles allegedly exploded and caught fire moments after Caddell inserted them into her boots and began walking outside, causing severe burns to her feet that required emergency medical treatment. Caddell claims she had no way of knowing the insoles posed a fire hazard and was using them exactly as intended when the batteries ignited.

The lawsuit contends that both Amazon and the Chinese manufacturer, Meisinuo, placed a defective and unreasonably dangerous product into the marketplace. It argues the insoles contained design or manufacturing flaws that made them prone to explosion and fire during normal use, and that neither company warned consumers of the risk.

“Defendant Amazon knew, or reasonably should have known, that Plaintiff would not realize the danger of an explosion and fire when using the product for its intended and reasonably foreseeable use.”

Joni Caddell v. Amazon.com Inc. and Meisinuo

Caddell raises claims of strict product liability, negligence and negligent undertaking. She alleges that Amazon was negligent in recommending, marketing and distributing the insoles despite their alleged dangers. The complaint also asserts that Amazon assumed a duty of care through its fulfillment program but failed to ensure the product was safe.

She is seeking damages exceeding $75,000 for medical expenses, pain, suffering and other losses.

Heated Insole Lawsuits Under Investigation

As a number of burn injuries being linked to defective heated insoles, electric socks and foot warmers continue to be reported, heated insole lawyers are now investigating claims for individuals nationwide. Heated insole burn injury lawsuits are being pursued for those who purchased the products and experienced any of the following:

  • Burns to the feet or toes
  • Heated insole overheated, ignited or caught fire during normal use
  • Emergency medical treatment or hospitalization for burn injuries
  • Surgery or skin grafts related to foot burns
  • Ongoing pain, scarring or mobility limitations

Lawsuits seek to hold manufacturers and distributors, such as Amazon, responsible for placing allegedly dangerous products into the marketplace without adequate safety testing or warnings. 

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Image Credit: Shutterstock.com / bluestork
Written By: Michael Adams

Senior Editor & Journalist

Michael Adams is a senior editor and legal journalist at AboutLawsuits.com with over 20 years of experience covering financial, legal, and consumer protection issues. He previously held editorial leadership roles at Forbes Advisor and contributes original reporting on class actions, cybersecurity litigation, and emerging lawsuits impacting consumers.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Tennessee man claims that a pair of rechargeable heated insoles exploded while he was wearing them, raising similar concerns to a growing number of lawsuits alleging defects may allow the batteries to overheat or fail.
A Georgia man has filed a lawsuit claiming that nitrous oxide canisters sold online through Amazon.com contributed to serious injuries and addiction.
Ahead of a case management conference this week, hair relaxer cancer lawsuit lawyers have asked a federal judge to set a date for the first bellwether trial.

About the writer

Michael Adams

Michael Adams

Michael Adams is a senior editor and legal journalist at AboutLawsuits.com with over 20 years of experience covering financial, legal, and consumer protection issues. He previously held editorial leadership roles at Forbes Advisor and contributes original reporting on class actions, cybersecurity litigation, and emerging lawsuits impacting consumers.