Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Do Not Use Infant Head-Shaped Pillows Due to Suffocation and Death Risk, FDA WarnsOn top of the health risks, the FDA says there is no evidence of any benefits to using infant head-shaped pillows November 4, 2022 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsParents should immediately stop using any infant head shaping pillow products, which are sold for treatment of flat-head syndrome and other infant medical conditions, since federal regulators warn they may create an unsafe sleeping environment that could lead to injury or death.The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released an infant head-shaping pillow safety communication on November 3, instructing parents and caregivers to immediately stop using infant head-shaping pillows, indicating these devices have zero medical benefit, and may put children at risk of suffocation or death.Infant head shaping pillows are small and typically round or rectangular-shaped, with an indent or hole in the middle to allow the back of a childโs head to rest in the opening. Manufacturers have marketed the pillows as medical devices intended to help prevent or treat flat head syndrome in infants.However, the agency warns that infant head shaping pillows are not FDA-approved and have not been cleared for any medical benefit, and that the use of the products may create an unsafe sleep environment for infants which could increase the risk of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID), sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and other causes of infant death, such as suffocation.According to the warning, the pillows may pose an entrapment and suffocation risk for infants who are not strong enough to lift their heads if they become pinned. Similar problems resulted have resulted in the recall of inclined infant sleepers, which have been linked to a number of deaths in recent years.Infant head shaping pillows may pose suffocation and entrapment risks due to children being able to rollover on their own, without the ability to lift their neck or turn back over. This scenario may cause a child to suffocate against the fabric of the pillows.FDA Infant Head Shaping Pillow RecommendationsWhile the agency did not report how many instances of head shaping pillow suffocation or deaths have been reported, parents are being instructed to stop using the pillows immediately to prevent the possibility of injury, or death.BABY FORMULA NEC LAWSUITSWas your premature child fed Similac or Enfamil?Premature infants fed Similac or Enfamil cow’s milk formula face an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or wrongful death.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONBABY FORMULA NEC LAWSUITSWas your premature child fed Similac or Enfamil?Premature infants fed Similac or Enfamil cow’s milk formula face an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or wrongful death.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONParents, daycare providers and caregivers are being asked to report any problems with the head shaping pillows throughย MedWatch, the FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting program, and to include the device name, manufacturer name and details of the event.Healthcare providers and pediatricians are being encouraged to communicate this safety notice to colleagues, care teams, parents, and caregivers who recommend, use, or may use infant head shaping pillows.Inclined Infant Sleeper Suffocation RisksAccording to the FDA, about 4,000 infants annually die unexpectedly during sleepย from accidental suffocation, sudden infant death syndrome, or unknown causes. Many of the reported fatalities are a result of suffocation from rolling on their sides or stomach.Inclined infant sleeper safety concerns first emerged in April 2019, when the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a Fisher-Price Rockโn Play warning, instructing consumers to stop placing their infants in the sleepers by three months old, or before they begin to show signs that they can roll over independently. The warning was issued after the CPSC publicly recognized at least 32 infant deaths related to the products.Following the warning, several manufacturers issued recalls of inclined sleeper products in April 2019, includingย Fisher-Priceโs recall of 4.7 million Rockโn Play Sleepers, Fischer-Priceโs recall of 71,000 Ultra-Lite Day & Night Play Yards and aย recall of 694,000 Kids II inclined rocking sleepers. Two years later, in 2021, aย 4-in-1 Rock โn Glide Soother recallย was issued after four reported infant fatalities associated with its use.In an ongoing effort to minimize the risk of deaths and injuries associated with the use of bassinets and cradles, the CPSC enacted new mandatory standards for inclined infant sleepers, which were published in the Code of Federal Regulations atย 16 CFR Part 1218.The CPSC announced that new safety standards for bassinets and cradles went into effect on June 23, requiring any infant sleep products have a sleep angle of no more than 10 degrees, in addition, all products must conform to the existing crib, play yard, and bassinet standards.The new rules now prohibits the sale of any infant sleep product with an incline greater than 10 degrees, and also requires all infant sleep products to go through a more stringent stability test procedure. The CPSC stated any products marketed for sleep such as inclined sleepers, travel or compact basinets or in-bed sleepers may no longer be marketed or sold for sleeping purposes. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Inclined Sleeper, Infant, Infant Death, Infant Pillow, Infant Sleeper, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, Suffocation Find Out If You Qualify for Infant Formula NEC CompensationMore Baby Formula Lawsuit Stories EnfaCare Preterm Infant NEC Lawsuit Alleges Formula Caused Life-Threatening Diagnosis June 16, 2026 Lawsuit Alleges Enfamil, Similac Cow’s Milk-Based Formula Caused Infant’s NEC Diagnosis June 9, 2026 Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Cleared For MDL Trial in July 2026 May 14, 2026 0 Comments FacebookThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: 2 days ago)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026) Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: 3 days ago)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 4 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)
Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: 2 days ago)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)
Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: 3 days ago)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 4 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)