Instant Pot Burn Caused By Failure of Pressure Cooker Safety Features: Lawsuit

An Alabama man has filed a lawsuit over Instant Pot burns experienced after his pressure cooker’s safety features failed, allowing the top to be removed while the contents were still cooking, causing scalding hot contents to be sprayed on his body.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Jeffrey Frank in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on March 14, presenting claims against the manufacturer, Instant Brands, Inc., for failing to redesign the pressure cooker with safer alternative safety features that may have prevent the explosion.

Instant Pots pressure cookers have been widely marketed over the past decade as a safe and effective kitchen appliance, suggesting that using the modern electronic device is “everyday magic”, and indicating that advanced safety mechanisms overcome traditional problems with pressure cookers exploding. However, Lewis joins a growing number of consumers now pursuing Instant Pot pressure cooker lawsuits, after safety features failed and the devices exploded, ejecting scalding hot liquid and contents.

Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer

Lewis indicates he suffered serious and substantial Instant Pot burn injuries in March 2021, when he was able to rotate and open the lid on the pressure cooker not knowing the contents were still under pressure.

“The incident occurred as a result of the failure of the pressure cooker’s supposed ‘safety mechanisms,’ which purport to keep the consumer safe while using the pressure cooker,” the lawsuit states. “In addition, the incident occurred as a result of Defendant’s failure to redesign the pressure cooker, despite the existence of economical, safer alternative designs.”

The lawsuit claims the manufacturer aggressively marketed and advertised the Instant Pot pressure cookers had safety mechanisms which should have prevented Lewis’s injuries.

Pressure Cooker Burn Lawsuits

Modern electronic pressure cookers have become increasingly popular in recent decades, amid marketing that has promoted advanced safety features that were supposed to prevent pressure cooker explosions that have plagued older, stove-top designs. Products have been marketed under a number of brand names, through social media, websites and home shopping stations.

Most of the problems involve similar pressure cooker burn injuries which occurred after the lid was removed while the contents were still under high pressure, typically resulting in burns covering a large percentage of the user’s body. However, other injuries linked to pressure cookers have included eye injuries, broken bones and other complications that resulted from electrocutions, spills or explosions.

As more of these electric pressure cookers have been introduced in recent years, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued several pressure cooker recalls over problems where lids were able to be opened while contents are under pressure, allowing hot contents to be expelled and causing a scald or burn injury to individuals in the immediate area.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Women are sharing alarming reports of pain, infections, and reconstruction failures caused by internal bra mesh implants like GalaFLEX, as the FDA confirms these devices were never approved for breast surgery and lawsuits now allege manufacturers failed to warn about the risks.
A federal judge will hold a hearing on Thursday with hair relaxer lawsuit parties in order to update the court on the status of the ongoing litigation.
Parties involved in Uber sexual assault lawsuits report ongoing negotiations in an effort to reach a potential settlement agreement to resolve more than 3,500 claims in federal and state courts.