Skip Navigation

Jackson-Pratt Surgical Drain Infection Lawsuit Filed Over Recalled, Contaminated Products

Jackson-Pratt Surgical Drain Infection Lawsuit Filed Over Recalled, Contaminated Products

A California man has filed a product liability lawsuit claiming that a recalled Jackson-Pratt surgical drain was not properly sterilized before being implanted during surgery, leading to a serious post-operative infection that required emergency treatment and ongoing medical care.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Brian Poe in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on February 2, naming Cardinal Health Inc. and Cardinal Health 200 LLC as defendants. Poe alleges the companies manufactured, distributed and sold Jackson-Pratt drains that were shipped to hospitals without undergoing required sterilization, despite being labeled and marketed as sterile medical devices.

Jackson-Pratt drains are commonly used during surgical procedures to remove blood and fluid from operative sites after an incision is closed. The flexible tubing and bulb-style reservoir are designed to remain inside a patient’s body for days following surgery, making sterility a critical safety requirement. According to the lawsuit, however, surgeons rely on manufacturers’ representations that the devices are sterile and suitable for implantation.

An unsterilized Jackson-Pratt surgical drain can pose serious, potentially life-threatening risks since they are implanted directly into the body during a critical healing period. Contamination can introduce bacteria into surgical wounds or around implants, increasing the risk of infections, abscesses and sepsis. These complications may delay recovery, require extended antibiotic treatment or additional surgery, and can lead to permanent tissue damage, chronic pain, long-term disability or life-threatening systemic infection.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Poe alleges he underwent a right anterior total hip replacement on February 8, 2024, during which a Jackson-Pratt surgical drain identified as part number SU130-402D and lot number 231151D2, was implanted near the surgical site. The complaint states that neither Poe nor his surgeon was aware at the time that the drain may not have been properly sterilized.

According to the lawsuit, Poe soon experienced worsening pain and post-surgical complications that were not consistent with a typical recovery. His surgical wound allegedly showed signs of infection, including abnormal drainage and tissue breakdown, ultimately requiring emergency surgical debridement on March 12, 2024.

The following month, Poe claims his surgeon informed him that the drain used during the procedure had been recalled due to sterility concerns. Cardinal Health issued a voluntary recall on March 28, 2024, acknowledging that certain Jackson-Pratt drains were distributed before sterilization and warning they could increase the risk of surgical site infections.

FDA records classify the action as a Class II recall, indicating a risk of medically significant health consequences, and include the same product and lot number allegedly implanted in Poe. The lawsuit claims Cardinal Health was responsible for sterilization, quality control and distribution, and that failures at multiple stages allowed unsterilized devices to reach patients, creating a foreseeable risk of infection.

“As a result, Plaintiff has endured prolonged immobility, months of physical therapy, and a delayed return to work, among other damages.”

Brian Poe v. Cardinal Health Inc. et al

Poe raises allegations of strict product liability, manufacturing defect, failure to warn, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of express and implied warranties. He is seeking compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life and other damages, as well as punitive damages.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Written By: Michael Adams

Senior Editor & Journalist

Michael Adams is a senior editor and legal journalist at AboutLawsuits.com with over 20 years of experience covering financial, legal, and consumer protection issues. He previously held editorial leadership roles at Forbes Advisor and contributes original reporting on class actions, cybersecurity litigation, and emerging lawsuits impacting consumers.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Pennsylvania woman says she suffered hearing loss and other long-term Depo-Provera side effects after receiving the birth control injections for nearly 20 years.
A federal judge has put in place additional procedures to address the deaths of women suffering from cancer who are pursuing hair relaxer lawsuits, allowing estates and families to take up their claims.
As legal sports betting expands nationwide, research and emerging lawsuits suggest that young men face disproportionate risks from mobile sportsbook apps that combine constant access, gamified design and aggressive promotional tactics, potentially accelerating patterns of gambling addiction and financial harm.

About the writer

Michael Adams

Michael Adams

Michael Adams is a senior editor and legal journalist at AboutLawsuits.com with over 20 years of experience covering financial, legal, and consumer protection issues. He previously held editorial leadership roles at Forbes Advisor and contributes original reporting on class actions, cybersecurity litigation, and emerging lawsuits impacting consumers.