MDL Established for Lawsuits Over 5 Hour Energy in Central District of CA

|

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has decided to consolidate all 5-Hour Energy lawsuits brought throughout the federal court system, centralizing the cases before one judge as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation. ย 

According to a Transfer Order (PDF) issued on June 5, all lawsuits filed over the sales and marketing of the controversial energy “shot” will be transferred to U.S. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez in the Central District of California for coordinated handling during pretrial proceedings.

5-Hour Energy is a popular energy drink distributed by Innovation Ventures, LLC, which does business as Living Essentials. The product is categorized as a dietary supplement, meaning that the manufacturer has been able to avoid FDA regulation.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Marketing statements made by the manufacturer indicate that 5 Hour Energy provides โ€œhours of energy now โ€“ no crash later,โ€ suggesting that users will not experience the sudden drop in energy typically associated with other high-caffeine energy drink products. According to National Advertising Division (NAD), part of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, there is data that disproves the claim, which is at least five years old.

There are currently at least nine lawsuits filed against Living Essentials filed in eight U.S. District Courts. All of the lawsuits involve similar allegations that Living Essentials practiced deceptive and unlawful advertising and marketing of 5-Hour Energy. Consolidation was proposed by the manufacturer.

Centralizing the 5-Hour Energy litigation before one judge is designed to reduce duplicative discovery, eliminate conflicting rulings from different judges and to serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses, and the courts. As additional cases are brought in the future, they will be transferred to Judge Gutierrez’s court for coordinated handling before trial.

All Energy Drink Products Under Closer Scrutiny

The energy drink industry has come under increased scrutiny over the past year, as concerns mount about the potentialhealth risks associated with energy drink productsย and various marketing claims that encourage young users to consume large quantities of the highly caffeinated beverages.

Most of the recent media attention has come following the aย wrongful death lawsuit filed against the makers of Monster Energy Drinks, which alleged that the popular beverage caused the death of a 14-year old girl, who died after drinking two cans of Monster in a 24 hour period.

According to information released by the FDA, there have been at least 13ย deaths linked to 5 Hour Energy Shots. Federal officials indicate that they do not actually know for certain whatโ€™s in 5-Hour Energy, as the two-ounce shots are classified as dietary supplements, meaning they are not subject to FDA regulation.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Plaintiffs and defendants have submitted a joint schedule for a final pretrial conference before the second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial over claims the port catheter is defectively designed.
Analysts expect wider use of breast reconstruction mesh through 2030, even as lawsuits raise questions about synthetic products, FDA approval and serious complications requiring additional surgery.