Lawsuit Alleges Elmiron Vision Side Effects Left User with Retinal Damage, Difficulty Adapting to Dim Light and Other Complications

According to allegations raised in a recently filed product liability lawsuit, an Illinois man was left with permanent retinal damage and vision impairment caused by side effects of Elmiron, which was taken for more than 15 years to treat the painful bladder syndrome known as interstitial cystitis.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Angelo Zenez earlier this month in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, indicating that the Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries, Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals, Inc., subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson, promoted Elmiron as safe and effective, without warning that it may be toxic to the retina.

Zenez indicates he took Elmiron from 1997 through 2003, for treatment of interstitial cystitis, indicating he was given no warning about the vision side effects and had no knowledge exposure to Elmiron may cause retinal damage. As a result, he now experiences difficulty reading and adapting to dark light, as well as blurred, distorted and cloudy vision.

Learn More About

Elmiron Lawsuits

Side effects of Elmiron have been associated with vision loss and retina damage known as pigmentary maculopathy.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

Although Elmiron has been on the market for decades, no warnings were provided about the toxic effect the painful bladder drug may have on the retina until earlier this year, leaving many doctors unaware the medication may be the cause of blindness and vision problems experienced by long-term users.

It was only after a series of independent case reports and studies were published about the link between Elmiron and pigmentary maculopathy that the drug maker announced a warning label update in June 2020, which now advises users, urologists and opthalmologists that Elmiron may cause retinal pigmentary changes, resulting in vision problems like difficulty adjusting in dark light, trouble reading, centralized dark spots and complete blindness.

“Almost immediately after the FDA approved Elmiron, patients and doctors began reporting serious complications relating to eye and vision problems taking Elmiron,” the lawsuit states. “Nearly 150 cases of eye disorders were reported to the FDA as adverse effects of Elmiron, ranging from blurred vision to maculopathy and blindness. Other reported symptoms include visual impairment, halo vision, and reduced visual acuity.”

Zenez’s claim joins a growing number of Elmiron lawsuits now being pursued throughout the U.S. court system, which were recently centralized for pretrial proceedings before one judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, where there are currently about 100 cases pending. However, as Elmiron lawyers continue to review and file claims in the coming months and years, it is expected several hundred, if not thousands, of similar complaints may be brought on behalf of former users nationwide.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released
AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released (Posted today)

AT&T faces a growing number of data breach class action lawsuits, which plaintiffs say should be consolidated before one federal judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge
Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge (Posted yesterday)

A federal judge has held a fairness hearing for a proposed Philips CPAP class action lawsuit settlement, which seeks to resolve claims that consumers suffered economic damages due to the massive recall over toxic sound abatement foam.