Lawsuit Filed Over Mirena Birth Control Migration

A Kentucky couple has filed a product liability lawsuit against Bayer over problems with Mirena birth control, alleging that the intrauterine device (IUD) is defectively designed and migrated away from where it was implanted. 

The complaint (PDF) was filed on December 17, by Kara Sweet and her husband, Brandon, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky.

According to allegations raised in the lawsuit, Sweet had a Mirena IUD implanted in December 2010, and a follow up examination revealed that the birth control device was properly placed.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Mirena is a t-shaped device that is designed for prevent pregnancy for up to five years. It was introduced by Bayer in 2000, and has been promoted as a hassle-free form of birth control.

However, Sweet indicates that she began to experience pain and cramps in her abdomen by January 2012, and an ultrasound examination revealed that the Mirena had migrated to somewhere between her uterus and rectum.

As a result of the Mirena birth control migration, Sweet ultimately had to undergo surgery to remove the device, which was found the right posterior portion of the cul-de-sac, next to the broad ligament.

Growing Number of Mirena Birth Control Lawsuits

The complaint is similar to a growing number of product liability lawsuits filed over Mirena birth control, where women allege that Bayer negligently designed the device and failed to adequately warn about the risk of debilitating injuries that may be caused by Mirena migration after placement.

In August, Bayer filed a request to centralize the Mirena birth control litigation filed in New Jersey state court, which is where the manufacturer’s U.S. headquarters are based. At that time, there were at least 16 different product liability lawsuits involving problems with Mirena filed throughout the state, and Bayer indicated that it expected the number of cases to continue to increase as Mirena product liability lawyers continue to review and file additional claims.

Sweet’s lawsuit accuses Bayer of defective manufacturing and design, negligence, failure to warn, strict liability, breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud. Her husband is suing for loss of consortium. The lawsuit seeks both compensatory and punitive damages.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025
Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025 (Posted yesterday)

A series of four bellwether claims in the baby formula NEC lawsuit MDL will be ready to go before a federal juries in May 2025, August 2025, November 2025 and February 2026 according to a proposed trial schedule agreed upon by both plaintiffs and defendants.

AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit MDL Established in Southern District of California
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit MDL Established in Southern District of California (Posted 2 days ago)

U.S. JPML has transferred all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings as part of a federal MDL (multidistrict litigation).