Lawsuit Alleges Single-Serve Coffee Maker Explosion Resulted in First, Second and Third Degree Burns

Woman claims a design defect allowed dangerous pressure to build inside her single-serve coffee maker, creating a risk of sudden explosion.

A Connecticut woman has filed a product liability lawsuit alleging she suffered severe burn injuries when a single-serve coffee maker malfunctioned, ejecting scalding liquid onto her torso and abdomen.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Christian Thyree Walls in Connecticut Superior Court late last month, naming Brentwood Appliances Inc. and Dollar Flash Inc. as defendants.

Single-serve coffee makers are commonly used household appliances designed to quickly brew individual cups of coffee by puncturing sealed pods and forcing hot water through them under pressure. However, when components fail or pressure is not properly controlled, these devices may pose a risk of sudden rupture or explosion.

A series of lawsuits have been filed in recent months over similar issues with popular household products. Earlier this year, a MyMini K-Cup lawsuit was filed claiming that when a woman turned off her MyMini Nostalgia machine and opened the lid, a pressurized K-cup suddenly burst, spraying scalding liquid and coffee grounds into her face. The explosion allegedly caused severe burns, permanent scarring and disfigurement.

Brentwood Appliances Single-Serve Coffee Maker Explosion

In her lawsuit, Walls claims she was using a Brentwood Appliances single-serve coffee maker at her home in New London, Connecticut when it suddenly exploded without warning, forcefully ejecting hot water onto her body. The incident involved model TS-110BK and occurred on November 11, 2024.

The complaint indicates the incident resulted in a range of serious injuries, including second- and third-degree burns to her torso and abdomen, as well as additional burns and ongoing physical and emotional pain.

Walls claims the coffee maker was defectively designed and manufactured, creating a risk of dangerous over-pressurization during normal operation. The lawsuit alleges the device failed to properly puncture the coffee pod, allowing pressure to build inside the machine and ultimately causing it to rupture.

In addition, the complaint points to a number of alleged design flaws, including a defective lid mechanism that could create a “false lock” position, giving users the impression the machine was securely closed when it was not. The lawsuit claims this condition allowed the lid to suddenly open under pressure, ejecting hot liquid and steam.

The filing further alleges the coffee maker lacked adequate features to safely release built-up pressure and failed to include sufficient warnings about the risk of explosion during normal use. The defendants are also accused of failing to properly test or inspect the product and continuing to sell it despite knowledge of the alleged defects.

The lawsuit contends that both Brentwood Appliances and Dollar Flash, which allegedly distributed and sold the product, are liable for placing an unreasonably dangerous appliance into the stream of commerce.

“As a further direct and proximate result of said injuries, the plaintiff, CHRISTIAN THYREE WALLS, has been impaired in her ability to pursue and to enjoy her life’s usual activities.”

— Christian Thyree Walls v. Brentwood Appliances Inc. et al

The complaint raises allegations of strict liability, malfunction theory and recklessness against both defendants. It is seeking damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, emotional distress and other losses associated with Walls’ injuries.

Defective Product Burn Injury Lawsuits

Walls’ case mirrors similar allegations raised in other product liability lawsuits, which claim that certain kinds of modern pressure cookers have been defectively designed and pose an increased risk of explosion during normal use.

These pressure cooker lawsuits have been brought against manufacturers such as SharkNinja, Crock-Pot and Instant Pot, with plaintiffs alleging the appliances were marketed as having built-in safety mechanisms that failed to work as intended, resulting in severe and sometimes permanent burn injuries.

In 2023, federal safety regulators announced recalls affecting nearly 1 million Insignia-brand pressure cookers sold at Best Buy, along with about 900,000 units produced by Sensio. The recalls were tied to lid defects that could allow the cookers to open or release hot contents while still pressurized, creating a risk of sudden explosions.

Similar design and safety concerns have been cited in lawsuits involving other popular brands, including Farberware, Ninja Foodi and Instant Pot.

Individuals injured in pressure cooker incidents may be eligible to seek compensation. Pressure cooker injury attorneys provide free case evaluations and work on a contingency basis, meaning legal fees are only collected if a financial recovery is secured.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.