Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
New Legislation Seeks to Ban Several Food Additives from Meat, Dairy ProductsMany of the listed chemicals have not been evaluated for food safety in decades, despite being outlawed in other countries, legislators warn. March 13, 2024 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsA group of Congressional legislators are calling for federal food regulators to reassess the safety of seven chemicals commonly used in meat, dairy, and egg products.Introduced by Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois on March 8, the Agricultural Food Chemical Reassessment Act (PDF) calls for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) to reassess seven chemicals used as emulsifiers, colorants, preservatives, and disinfecting agents used in the food packaging process.The bill is being co-sponsored by Representatives Eleanor Holmes Norton, from D.C., Ro Khanna of California and Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, and would require the reevaluation butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), cetylpyridnium chloride, sodium aluminum phosphate, sodium nitrite, sulfuric acid, and titanium dioxide, to determine if they are safe for use in human food.Some Food Additives Not Reviewed for DecadesAccording to a press release issued by Schakowsky, these chemicals have not been evaluated for food safety in decades, and several are banned in the European Union (EU) and other countries due to potential health concerns.BHA was last evaluated for safety in 1977, and has been listed on Californiaโs Proposition 65 list of dangerous chemicals since 1990. BHT has not been reviewed since 1977, and cetylpyridnium chloride was last reviewed in 2004, but was banned for use in the EU.Sodium aluminum phosphate was reviewed in 1977 and banned for most uses in the EU, including for use in all meat, poultry, and egg products. Sodium nitrite was reviewed in 1984 but was banned in Norway and Sweden. Sulfuric acid was last reviewed in 1980. Titanium dioxide was reviewed in 1972, but the EU and six other countries banned the chemical from use.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe lawmakers say these chemicals were chosen for the bill because their use can be traced to adverse health side effects. Prior research indicates exposure to the additives can cause cancer, hormone disruption, reproductive toxicity, ulcerative colitis, DNA changes, damage to the kidneys, liver, lungs, eye and skin irritation, inflammation, and environmental toxicity.“As a longtime champion for food safety, it is imperative that we continue to make progress on food chemical safety across agencies,” Schakowsky stated in the press release. “Consumers deserve to know that the foods they are eating are safe and free from harmful chemicals.โEmulsifier Food Additive RisksResearch links emulsifier food additives to an increased risk of developing different types of cancer, including breast and prostate cancer. Emulsifiers are widely used in food products such as frozen pizzas, ice cream, and other processed foods.Most of the chemicals on the list entered the food supply through the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) food approval designation.The GRAS designation allows food additive manufacturers, instead of federal regulators, to determine if the chemicals are considered safe and allow them for use in the food supply.Last year, California lawmakers enacted legislation to ban the use of four chemicals in food, including brominated vegetable oil, red dye number 3, potassium bromate, and propylparaben chemicals. The chemicals are allowed for use in food by the FDA, but California banned them due to research linking their use to increased risk of cancer, behavioral problems in children, reproductive issues, and endocrine disruption.If the bill is passed, an assessment will be carried out by the administrator of the USDAโs FSIS. However, the bill must first be voted on by the full House of Representatives, after which it would move to the Senate for a final vote and, if approved, be signed into law by the President. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Cancer, Chemicals, Congress, DNA, Emulsifiers, Food Additives, Hormones, Ulcerative ColitisMore Lawsuit Stories Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL August 24, 2026 Kratom Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Opioid-Like Products Caused Addiction, Cardiac Injury August 24, 2026 Clear Eyes Recall Issued Due to Risk Eye Drops May Be Contaminated August 24, 2026 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)A federal judge has appointed a group of plaintiffs attorneys to leadership positions in the growing Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator federal litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (08/18/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026) Similac Settlement Provides $670M Payout To Resolve 2,000 NEC Lawsuits (Posted: 3 days ago)Abbott Laboratories has agreed to pay $670 million to resolve more than 2,000 Similac NEC injury lawsuits, as the first federal NEC trial against competitor Mead Johnson gets underway.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITMissouri Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Similac, Enfamil NEC Lawsuit (08/20/2026)Enfamil Necrotizing Enterocolitis Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin This Week (08/11/2026)Neocate Infant Formula Lawsuit Alleges Nutritional Defect Caused Rickets, Bone Fractures (08/05/2026) Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: 4 days ago)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)
Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL August 24, 2026
Kratom Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Opioid-Like Products Caused Addiction, Cardiac Injury August 24, 2026
Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)A federal judge has appointed a group of plaintiffs attorneys to leadership positions in the growing Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator federal litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (08/18/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026)
Similac Settlement Provides $670M Payout To Resolve 2,000 NEC Lawsuits (Posted: 3 days ago)Abbott Laboratories has agreed to pay $670 million to resolve more than 2,000 Similac NEC injury lawsuits, as the first federal NEC trial against competitor Mead Johnson gets underway.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITMissouri Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Similac, Enfamil NEC Lawsuit (08/20/2026)Enfamil Necrotizing Enterocolitis Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin This Week (08/11/2026)Neocate Infant Formula Lawsuit Alleges Nutritional Defect Caused Rickets, Bone Fractures (08/05/2026)
Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: 4 days ago)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)