Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Warning Labels Have Little Effect on High-Powered Magnet Ingestions, Study FindsDespite magnet warnings, most consumers fail to appreciate the risks posed by high-powered magnet sets, which can cause serious side effects if accidentally swallowed October 10, 2022 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsHigh powered magnets used in a number of consumer products have caused devastating injuries among children and mentally disabled adults in recent years, often occurring when one or more of the magnets are put into the mouth and accidentally swallowed. However, new research suggests warnings added by the manufacturers have done little to reduce the risk.Rare earth metals are used to create powerful magnets in adult desk toys or building sets, which allow the small magnets to be connected and formed into various shapes and designs. However, problems have been reported involving injuries and deaths that resulted from accidentally swallowing the magnets, while attempting to simulate a pierced tongue or attracting the magnets through the cheeks, leading to serious medical emergencies when the magnets become attracted across intestinal walls.Magnet ingestion Injury RisksWhen the high-powered magnets are swallowed, they can attract to each other and other material, even through internal body tissue and across the intestinal tract. This can cut off the blood supply to various organs and lead to serious injuries, such as perforations to the intestine, twisting, blocked intestines, infections, blood poisoning and death.’According to aย magnet information centerย website published by the CPSC, nearly 3,000 children and teenagers swallowed the magnets and had to be treated in emergency rooms nationwide between 2009 and 2013.The CPSC reports that more than 26,000 magnet ingestions were treated in hospital emergency rooms from 2010 to 2021. The cases have continued to rise every year since 2018, and have resulted in at least seven deaths from magnet ingestions; mostly involving toy magnet sets.Study Finds Toy Magnet Warning Labels to be IneffectiveIn a new study published this month in the medical journal Pediatrics, researchers from Nationwide Childrenโs Hospital in Ohio sought to determine whether existing warning labels on powerful toy magnet products are effective at helping consumers identify risks, and whether toys that contained more detailed warning labels were associated with fewer child ingestion injuries.Researchers issued questionnaires to voluntary participants enrolled in the Injuries, Morbidity, and Parental Attitudes Concerning Tiny High-powered Magnets (IMPACT of Magnets), which is a multicenter study of individuals who have suffered magnet-related injuries from ingestion or bodily insertion.Of the 596 patients, 174 participants responded to the questionnaire, which specifically asked whether they knew if the product had a warning label, if they read the warning label and whether they knew of the inherent dangers associated with toy magnets.Responses indicated 53.6% of respondents reported not knowing whether the products had a warning label on them, indicating consumers may not even be reading the posted hazards. Furthermore, researchers found 44.3% of respondents believed the products were just kidโs toys and were not aware of the potential dangers.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONOf the 28 toy magnets with warning labels confirmed, only 13 consumers reported reading the labels, and only 6.9% knew high-powered magnets have been previously removed from the U.S. market.Overall, 90% of the participants either did not know if warning labels were present, or failed to read them if they were present. The study authors claimed this data indicates warning labels on high-powered magnets are not a sufficient safeguard, as they are unlikely to prevent injuries to children.Toy Magnet Safety RulesIn response to concerns about the devastating effects of high-powered magnet ingestions, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) made attempts in to ban certain toy sets from the market in 2014.Theย toy magnet safety rules, enacted in October 2014, came after several battles with manufacturers to get them to recall products after the CPSC determined that warnings provided were insufficient to avoid injuries. One of the magnet manufacturers, Zen Magnets, LLC, protested the new rules, and challenged them in court and won.The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit overturned the ban in 2016, indicating the CPSC did not have enough data to show the magnets were unsafe, allowing the sale of magnet sets to continue. Aย day after the ruling, Zen Magnets and the U.S. Department of Justice entered into aย consent agreement (PDF)ย on a $5.5 million civil penalty aimed at the company for illegally selling more than 400,000 recalled magnets. However, the details of the civil penalty required Zen Magnets to ultimately pay only $10,000.Last month, new federal safety standard for toy magnet products were announced, which now require loose or separable magnets in certain products to be made too large to swallow, or magnetically weakened, to avoid the risk of internal injuries when swallowed.If the magnets fit in a small parts cylinder, they must have a flux index (how magnet strength is measured) of less than 50 kG2 mm2. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Child Death, Children, Infant Death, MagnetsMore Lawsuit Stories Judge Sets Next Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit for Trial in January 2027 September 11, 2026 DraftKings Lawsuit Indicates ‘Event Contracts’ Are Nothing More Than Sports Bets September 11, 2026 Social Media Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Major Platforms to Child Suicides September 11, 2026 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Judge Sets Next Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit for Trial in January 2027 (Posted: yesterday)The U.S. District Judge presiding over all Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits has scheduled the next bellwether trial to begin on January 11.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Mesh Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge This Week, Following Landmark Verdict (08/17/2026)Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (08/05/2026)Hernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026) Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: 3 days ago)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)
Judge Sets Next Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit for Trial in January 2027 (Posted: yesterday)The U.S. District Judge presiding over all Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits has scheduled the next bellwether trial to begin on January 11.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Mesh Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge This Week, Following Landmark Verdict (08/17/2026)Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (08/05/2026)Hernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026)
Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: 3 days ago)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)