Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Medtronic Bone Growth Agent Linked to Neck Surgery Problems July 1, 2009 AboutLawsuits Add Your Comments A new study seems to indicate that the bone growth agent in the Medtronic Infuse bone graft may be linked to life-threatening problems after neck surgery, where it may cause swelling that makes it difficult to breath. The study, conducted by researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, was published June 30 in The Journal of the American Medical Association, and found that Infuse and other products that use a bioengineered bone growth protein called BMP appear to result in a higher incidence of neck surgery problems when they are used during cervical spinal fusion procedures to correct neck pains. The study looked at both Infuse, and a Stryker product called OP-1 Putty, which is used in a very limited number of patients where other spinal fusion methods are not an option. Learn More About Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuits Excessive bone growth, nerve damage inked to Medtronic Infuse BMP. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuits Excessive bone growth, nerve damage inked to Medtronic Infuse BMP. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The bone growth proteins were first approved in 2002 for use during lower back fusions. However, some doctors also use the bone graft to treat upper spinal pain, which the study data indicates can lead to an increased risk of complications. In 2006, the two products were used in 25 percent of all spinal fusion surgeries, with Infuse accounting for most of the BMP use. Use of BMP has become popular because it allows bone to heal faster after surgery. It also tends to require less repeat surgeries, and doctors do not have to harvest the bone from other parts of the body, such as the hip. The study found that patients who received bioengineered proteins in upper spinal fusion procedures suffered a complication rate of 7 percent; 50 percent higher than those who did not. When used on lower spinal, or lumbar, fusion procedures, there was no increase in complications, however. Researchers say the rate of complication is probably higher, because the study only looked at patients who suffered complications while still in the hospital recovering from surgery. Many patients likely had complications after they left the hospital that went unreported. The FDA issued an alert last year advising doctors not use infuse in upper spinal fusion procedures after receiving 38 reports of potentially fatal complications that included swelling of the neck and breathing difficulties. An FDA advisory panel recommended the FDA not approve OP-1 Putty for wider use in late March. A number of Medtronic Infuse lawsuits have ben filed on behalf of individuals who experienced problems with breathing and swallowing that developed days or weeks following their neck surgery. This can lead to an emergency tracheotomy or death. In November 2008, the U.S. Department of Justice initiated an investigation into the actions of Medtronic, Inc., and whether they actively promoted and marketed the Infuse bone graft for use in the cervical spine. While doctors are allowed to use FDA approved medical devices for non-approved purposes, the manufacturer is not allowed to promote or encourage such uses that they have not established as safe and effective. Tags: Bone Graft, Medical Device, Medtronic, Medtronic Infuse, Stryker More Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Stories Medtronic Infuse Problems Hidden From Regulators, Report Claims April 12, 2016 Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Appealed to U.S. Supreme Court Over Off-Label Marketing September 21, 2015 Side Effects of Bone Graft Substitutes Linked to Child Health Risks, FDA Warns January 22, 2015 1 Comments Christine October 17, 2014 I received a BMP bone graft during a surgery on my neck, I have recently become aware of the off label use of this product during cervical surgeries. The bone graft material used for my surgery was manufactured by Stryker and not Medtronic. I have suffered similar symptoms to those described by others that received the Medtronic compound. For 9 long years I have been seeing a Pain management specialist because I wasn’t aware of what was causing my pain, although I always suspected that it had something to do with the bone graft material thank was used. I have had EMG’s that showed nerve irritation at he lowest level of my fusion. I went through another surgery with a different surgeon this year because I was no longer receiving any benefit from the Epidural Steroid injections that I was receiving in my neck due to severe pain. Unfortunately the nerve pain still remains following my recent surgery. My life has been turned upside down because of the surgery I received in 2005. I have tried changing jobs hoping to find something that I could do that would not cause me daily pain. However, this has not helped, I currently am only able to work 2 days a week in my profession and after a day at work I experience increased pain. I truly feel that the bone grafting material has affected me permanently and I am currently considering disability because I am unable to most things due to the pain in my neck and arms. I would love to speak with someone to see if there is anything I can do. If you feel you could help me I would appreciate discussing this with you. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermEmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Four BioZorb Breast Tissue Marker Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials (Posted: today) As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITCourt Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/26/2025)Group of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025) Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: yesterday) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025) Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: 2 days ago) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)
Four BioZorb Breast Tissue Marker Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials (Posted: today) As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITCourt Clears BioZorb Lawsuit Design Defect Claims Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/26/2025)Group of 7 BioZorb Injury Lawyers Appointed to Leadership Positions in Lawsuits Over Recalled Breast Tissue Marker (03/19/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File Lawsuit Over Recalled BioZorb Tissue Marker (03/12/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: yesterday) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)
Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: 2 days ago) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)