Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Medtronic Updates Doctors on Reports of Sprint Fidelis Lead Deaths March 16, 2009 AboutLawsuits Add Your CommentsAccording to a letter sent to doctors on Friday by Medtronic, Inc., at least 107 deaths have been reportedly linked to their recalled Sprint Fidelis defibrillator leads. However, Medtronic only acknowledges that the defective leads were a “possible or likely contributing factor” in 13 of the cases.The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead is a small electrical wires that was used to connect cardiac defibrillators to the heart between 2004 and 2007.In October 2007, a Medtronic recall was issued for the Sprint Fidelis leads due to an increased risk that the wire may fracture or break, which could result in unnecessary shocks or cause the defibrillator not to work if it is needed to deliver a life-saving jolt.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAbout 268,000 people worldwide had the defective leads implanted in their bodies, and Medtronic acknowledged at the time of the recall that at least 5 deaths had been caused by their product.On March 13, 2009, Medtronic provided their first update for doctors about the number of Sprint Fidelis deaths that have been reported and confirmed.According to the letter, the FDA has received reports of 107 deaths which were allegedly caused by faulty lead wires. However, Medtronic indicates that most of the reports were made directly by patients or their product liability lawyers, without substantial supporting data.Medtronic convened a panel of physicians who reviewed 89 of the Sprint Fidelis death reports, and they only identified the defective defibrillator leads as a possible or likely factor in 13 of the fatalities.The panel did note that over 30% of the deaths (4 out of 13) occurred in patients who were having the Sprint Fidelis leads removed from the veins which carry the small wire from the defibrillator to the heart.This highlights the difficult position patients are placed in if their lead does fracture, as scar tissue often forms around the lead wire, making it very risky to remove the lead or attempt to thread a new lead through the vein.Last month, an independent study published by the medical journal Heart Rhythm, found that the Sprint Fidelis leads are only continuing to work in about 88% of patients reviewed at three years. The researchers also suggested that the risk of a lead fracture is higher than originally thought and is continuing to increase as time passes.About 2,000 Medtronic defibrillator lead lawsuits have been filed by patients who had the Sprint Fidelis lead implanted.In January 2009, U.S. District Judge Richard H. Kyle, who has been assigned to oversee pretrial litigation in all of the federal cases, indicated that the Sprint Fidelis lawsuits will be dismissed based on a recent Supreme Court decision that found medical device product liability claims are pre-empted by federal law if the device was approved by the FDA.Earlier this month, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2009 was introduced in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House to reverse the Supreme Court interpretation of federal law. If passed, the legislation would protect consumers ability to pursue product liability lawsuits, and likely restore patients’ ability to hold Medtronic responsible for injuries caused by their defective defibrillator leads. Tags: Defibrillator, Defibrillator Lead, Medtronic, Medtronic Recall, Product Liability, Sprint FidelisMore Lawsuit Stories Silicosis Lawsuit Alleges 3M Respirator Mask Failed to Protect Stone Worker September 15, 2026 L’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers September 15, 2026 Lawsuit Blames Mounjaro, Ozempic Side Effects for Vision Loss September 15, 2026 6 Comments Tony November 25, 2011 I am 100% dependant on my device. When I found out about the leads(via the radio and internet), I was told by my then electrocardiologist that it was more risk to change out the leads,than to replace them.After having moved,my new electrocardiologist was outraged at what I had been told.Luckily I only experienced 2 shocks,but being 100% dependant on the device under those conditions is nothing other than a life or death situation.Within the same week of meeting my new doctor,new leads were installed. I had the recall leads for 11/2 yrs prior to correction.And FYI,leads can come loose at the device! And I’m still kickin! david September 29, 2010 i srongly feel that the medical safety act should be passed as a recipent of the sprint leads fractures i received 3 horrible schocks in oct 2006 which now requires meto take pain medication 4 times a day for severe joint pain. when discussed with my heart dr i was given 3 different causes for the schock happening. they turned the defillubrator off and went back in and did something which has helped but not sure what they had done Bernice July 2, 2009 Why aren’t medicines and medical devices being tested longer and more accurately? jack May 8, 2009 100% paced , non removable ,,WHO THEN IS RESPONSIBLE ? donald March 30, 2009 the medical device safety act s540/hr1346 should be sigin by all as soon as it can be. people are geting hurt very bad by this. JILL March 16, 2009 Please show your support of The Medical Device Safety Act S540/HR 1346 by signing and posting comments to “The Medical Device Safety Act Petition” found at http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tftwj23/petition.html Thank you. CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Silicosis Lawsuit Alleges 3M Respirator Mask Failed to Protect Stone Worker (Posted: today)A California stone workerโs silicosis lawsuit claims 3M respirator masks provided inadequate protection against hazardous silica dust.MORE ABOUT: SILICOSIS LAWSUITQuartz Countertop Worker Files Silica Exposure Lawsuit After Silicosis Diagnosis (08/31/2026)Hundreds of Silicosis Cases Diagnosed Among Quartz Countertop Workers in California: Report (08/25/2026)Silica Dust Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturers Knew of Silicosis Risks From Quartz Countertops (04/06/2026) Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (Posted: yesterday)Attorneys will meet tomorrow for a final pretrial conference ahead of the third Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (09/09/2026)Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026) Judge Sets Next Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit for Trial in January 2027 (Posted: 4 days ago)The U.S. District Judge presiding over all Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits has scheduled the next bellwether trial to begin on January 11.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Mesh Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge This Week, Following Landmark Verdict (08/17/2026)Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (08/05/2026)Hernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026)
Silicosis Lawsuit Alleges 3M Respirator Mask Failed to Protect Stone Worker (Posted: today)A California stone workerโs silicosis lawsuit claims 3M respirator masks provided inadequate protection against hazardous silica dust.MORE ABOUT: SILICOSIS LAWSUITQuartz Countertop Worker Files Silica Exposure Lawsuit After Silicosis Diagnosis (08/31/2026)Hundreds of Silicosis Cases Diagnosed Among Quartz Countertop Workers in California: Report (08/25/2026)Silica Dust Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturers Knew of Silicosis Risks From Quartz Countertops (04/06/2026)
Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (Posted: yesterday)Attorneys will meet tomorrow for a final pretrial conference ahead of the third Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITJury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (09/09/2026)Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)
Judge Sets Next Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit for Trial in January 2027 (Posted: 4 days ago)The U.S. District Judge presiding over all Covidien hernia mesh lawsuits has scheduled the next bellwether trial to begin on January 11.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITCovidien Mesh Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge This Week, Following Landmark Verdict (08/17/2026)Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (08/05/2026)Hernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026)