RSS
TwitterFacebook

Mirena IUD Pseudotumor Cerebri Problems Result in Need of Brain Fluid Shunt, Lawsuit Alleges

  • Written by: Irvin Jackson
  • 3 Comments

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

According to allegations raised in a product liability lawsuit recently filed against Bayer, an Arizona woman suffered severe pseudotumor cerebri problems from a Mirena IUD, after the birth control implant caused a dangerous build up of fluid around the brain.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Daniella Pavelka in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on July 19, indicating that the condition required placement of a brain shunt to drain her cerebrospinal fluid.

Mirena IUD is a form of long-acting birth control, involving a T-shaped implanted that is placed into the uterus for up to five years, releasing the progestin levonorgestrel. Although exposure to levenorgestrel has been linked to problems with pseudotumor cerebri in other birth control products, Pavelka indicates that Bayer failed to warn women or the medical community that the risk may be linked to side effects of Mirena as well.

Pavelka is currently 28 years old, and indicates that she had a Mirena IUD implanted in April 2013. Shortly after it was placed, Pavelka indicates that she began experiencing severe headaches, blackouts, blurred vision and other problems.

Only a few weeks after the IUD was implanted, Pavelka was diagnosed with pseudotumor cerebri, which is a medical condition involving a build up of fluid pressure on the brain, which can lead to permanent damage to the optic nerve, causing vision problems, headaches and other ailments.

As a result of the condition, Pavelka indicates that she has been prescribed several diuretics, undergone several lumbar punctures, MRI and CT scan procedures, and ultimately had a shunt placed to drain fluid away from her brain. However, she indicates that she has been permanently injured due to the Mirena pseudotumor cerebri problems.

“Unfortunately, therapeutic shunting procedures have high failure and revision rates and often require several repeat or revision surgeries,” the lawsuit states. “Additionally, a patient’s shunt may need frequent adjustment, which may also require surgical intervention, to find the right setting for a particular patient’s needs.”

Growing Mirena Pseudotumor Cerebri Lawsuits

The case is one of a growing number of similar Mirena IUD lawsuits over pseudotumor cerebri (PTC) filed in recent months, each allege that Bayer withheld information from women and the medical community about the risk that levonorgestrel released by the implant may cause the sudden buildup of pressure on the brain.

Lawsuits allege that this prevented users and doctors from promptly recognizing the symptoms of PTC, which may have allowed women to avoid long-term optic nerve damage.

In several other countries, including South Africa and Hong Kong, warning information provided with the Mirena IUD indicate that papilledema is a possible side effect. However, Bayer has not given women in America or the U.S. medical community the same information.

Amid a growing number of Mirena pseudotumor cerebri cases brought throughout the federal court system against Bayer, a request was filed last year with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to centralize the cases before one judge. However, that request was rejected, so Pavelka’s claim and others filed by other women nationwide are proceeding without coordinated pretrial proceedings.

In addition to problems with pseudotumor cererbri, Mirena IUDs have also been linked to reports of the IUD perforating the uterus or moving out of position, causing severe internal injuries for many women. There is a separate multidistrict litigation (MDL) established for Mirena migration injury lawsuits, which currently includes about 4,000 complaints pending before U.S. District Judge Cathy Seibel in the Southern District of New York, where a small group of “bellwether” cases are being prepared for early trial dates.

Tags: , , , , ,

3 comments

  1. Danielle Reply

    Has anyone also had head shakes

  2. Nicole Reply

    I had the mirena IUD from 2000 to 2005. After removal, which was difficult and painful due to migration and strings difficult to reach. My husband and I attempted, unsuccessfully, to get pregnant. After 18 months with no success we stopped trying. In 2010, after we divorced, I had my tubes tied along with exploration to determine what was the next step. The results showed that I had severe endometriosis and adenomyosis. I had a full hysterectomy two months later.

  3. Denise Reply

    This is very frightening to me. I have been having severe headaches with blurred vision. After insertion I went back for the initial checkup and the strings were no longer visible. I had to have an ultrasound to see if it was still there

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.